ClickCease

Results for personal grievance

Showing 289-296 of 363 results
BRENNAN v STELLA 2020 LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 449 - dismissal without fair process; compensation and lost wages

Ms Brennan's employment with Stella 2020 ended on 30 July 2024 without a fair disciplinary or dismissal process. The employer did not participate effectively in the ERA investigation, which proceeded on the evidence available to the Authority.

Matched passage: The Authority was satisfied that Ms Brennan lost wages as a result of her personal grievance and the actions of Stella.
KUMAR v JK HOSPITALITY NZ LIMITED [2025] NZERA 442 - break and support failures caused constructive dismissal

Mr Kumar resigned from JK Hospitality after alleging he was repeatedly denied proper breaks and practical support at work. The ERA considered whether those breaches were sufficiently serious that resignation was a reasonably foreseeable response.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
DA SILVA v DSJ JOINERY LIMITED [2025] NZERA 444 - no express dismissal at meeting, but later conduct ended employment

Mr Da Silva left a meeting with DSJ Joinery believing he had been dismissed, although the employer said the meeting was about health and safety rather than discipline. The ERA examined whether there was an actual dismissal and, if not, whether the employer's conduct nevertheless ended the relationship.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
CHASE-PONA v COIN TOTAL WELLINGTON LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 428 - dismissed during notice period; constructive dismissal in alternative

Mr Chase-Pona resigned after workplace disputes including a theft allegation, but Coin Total terminated his employment before his notice period expired. The ERA had to determine whether the employment ended by resignation, dismissal or constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
BALI v R1i TECHNOLOGY LIMITED [2025] NZERA 409 - Webex dismissal without fair process

R1i Technology dismissed Mr Bali during a Webex meeting and then confirmed the decision in writing. The employer did not participate in the ERA proceeding and the evidence showed no meaningful process satisfying the minimum statutory tests of procedural fairness.

Matched passage: Mr Bali has established a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.
JIANG v TRUSTED TOUCH THERAPY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) and ORS [2025] NZERA 385 - unjustified dismissal and employment-standard breaches

Ms Jiang worked for Trusted Touch Therapy under disputed casual-employment paperwork and later raised dismissal and minimum-employment-standard claims. The company entered liquidation after the investigation meeting, and the ERA also considered inaccurate wage and time records.

Matched passage: In summary, Ms Jiang raised her unjustified dismissal personal grievance with TTTL through her lawyer's correspondence dated 28 March 2024.
RAPANA v UBP LIMITED [2025] NZERA 367 - medical-incapacity dismissal unjustified; contribution reduced compensation

UBP dismissed Mr Rapana after a prolonged period of absence and communication difficulties. The case examined the medical information available to the employer, inconsistencies in the reasons later given for dismissal and whether the investigation fairly addressed the real circumstances.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
DQJ v COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE [2025] NZERA 365 - Inland Revenue ended employment prematurely without exhausting alternatives

Inland Revenue ended DQJ's employment after a lengthy deterioration in workplace relationships and concerns that it said could no longer be resolved. The ERA examined whether IR had exhausted fair alternatives before treating the relationship as incapable of continuing.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.

Browse topics