ClickCease
Employee employment law help · Auckland

Employment Advocate Auckland

Employment problems can move quickly. We help Auckland employees assess what happened, preserve the evidence, raise the right claim and decide whether negotiation, mediation or the Employment Relations Authority is the sensible next step.

Dismissed or facing formal action? Most Personal Grievances generally need to be raised within 90 days. Save the employment agreement, letters, emails, texts, meeting invitations, notes and any relevant rosters or payslips. If you are thinking about resigning, get advice before doing it if you can.

Employment problems we help with in Auckland

Start with the problem that best matches what has happened at work.

Employment law help in Auckland

Auckland workplaces range from CBD professional and corporate environments to construction, logistics, healthcare, retail, hospitality, trades and smaller owner-operated businesses. The legal tests are national, but the facts are workplace-specific: who made the decision, what process was followed, what documents exist, and whether the employer had a fair and reasonable basis for what it did.

Auckland matters can involve substantial document trails, multiple managers or HR personnel, and formal investigation or restructure processes. We focus on reducing that material to the points that matter: the employer’s stated reason, the information relied on, the opportunity to respond, the decision actually made and the loss or disadvantage that followed.

Issues we commonly focus on

  • Restructures and redundancies in larger or multi-layered organisations
  • Performance management, warnings and disciplinary investigations
  • Dismissal and disadvantage claims involving shift, logistics, retail and service work
  • Professional and managerial employment disputes where documents and process are central

Areas covered

This is a regional starting point, not a boundary on who can contact us.

Auckland CBD North Shore West Auckland South Auckland East Auckland Manukau Henderson Albany Takapuna Warkworth and the wider Auckland region

What happens next

1

Assess

Work out the facts, documents, legal issue, deadline and realistic outcomes.

2

Raise & negotiate

Raise the claim properly and test whether the dispute can be resolved directly.

3

Mediation

Prepare the evidence and position for MBIE employment mediation and settlement discussions.

4

ERA / Court

If resolution is not sensible, progress the claim through the ERA and, where required, the Employment Court.

Employment cases connected to Auckland

Recent Anderson Law case summaries that mention this region, a local workplace, registry or hearing location.

13 Aug 2026

Eun Joo Kim v Sage & Umber Limited and Pei Su [2026] NZERA 555 - public attack caused constructive dismissal

Café owner Pei Su loudly questioned chef Eun Joo Kim's competence and trustworthiness in front of other staff and told her that if she could not do the job she could go. The ERA found this repudiatory conduct caused an unjustified constructive dismissal. Sage & Umber Limited was ordered to pay $8,704.40 gross lost wages, $18,000 compensation, wage and holiday-pay arrears, interest and a penalty.

13 Aug 2026

Valerie Leech v Electrical Importing Co Limited [2026] NZERA 553 - employment was agreed before the 90-day trial was signed

Electrical Importing Co Limited agreed the job's core terms with Valerie Leech and directed her when to start before presenting a written agreement containing a 90-day trial. The ERA found she was already an employee when the trial provision was signed, so the trial was invalid and her dismissal was unjustified. She was awarded $21,250 gross lost remuneration and $13,000 compensation.

10 Aug 2026

Jonathan Rhodes v Barfoot & Thompson Limited [2026] NZERA 543 - medical incapacity dismissal before a genuine opportunity to recover

Barfoot & Thompson Limited dismissed Senior Property Manager Jonathan Rhodes for medical incapacity while he was recovering from concussion and further head injuries. The ERA found he had not received a genuine opportunity to recover, the inquiry into his prognosis was incomplete, an imminent neurological assessment was not awaited, and the proposed alternative role did not reflect the clinical advice for a graduated return on reduced hours. The dismissal was unjustified and Barfoot & Thompson was ordered to pay $30,000 compensation.

Browse the full employment-law and case library

Use the Anderson Law employment-law library

The regional page is the entry point, not a separate silo. Search the wider guides, ERA decisions and Employment Court material for the issue that actually affects your case.

Nearby and related regions

These are geographically or practically connected regional pages, not a generic island-wide list.

View all New Zealand locations

Want us to look at what happened?

Send the basic facts through the case form. Include the important dates and the documents you already have.

Browse topics