ClickCease

Special Interest Cases


Special Interest Cases


Search
Search articles and guides.
Tip: press / to search
Showing 1-4 of 4 articles in Special Interest Cases
VLN v Elizabeth Rose Dotcom, Kim Dotcom and Contractors Only Limited [2026] NZERA 508 - urgent removal to Employment Court

VLN brought an employment status and employment standards claim arising from work performed at properties associated with Kim Dotcom and Elizabeth Dotcom. With Mr Dotcom facing possible extradition, VLN sought urgent removal of the entire proceeding from the Employment Relations Authority to the Employment Court before any Authority investigation. The ERA accepted that the possible departure of Mr Dotcom, the unresolved employment status issues, and the potential minimum employment standards claims created sufficient urgency and public interest. The whole matter was removed to the Employment Court. The Authority also made an interim non-publication order protecting VLN's identity.

Philip Moller v Cardinal Logistics Limited [2026] NZERA 318 - drug test refusal, unjustified dismissal, unjustified suspension

Cardinal Logistics Limited dismissed the Applicant after he refused a drug and alcohol test, but the ERA found Cardinal did not establish genuine and reasonable grounds for requiring that test. Cardinal let him keep driving for about two hours after the alleged safety complaint, failed to verify the allegation, and the dismissal and suspension were found unjustified.

Shania Mackey v Shearing NZ Limited [2026] NZERA 146 - employer withheld s 149 settlement payments after alleged confidentiality breach; compliance ordered; penalties adjourned

After a s 149 mediated settlement, the employer was required to pay $3,000 compensation to the employee, pay $3,500+GST to the employee's representative on invoice, and provide a certificate of service. The employer deliberately withheld compliance after hearing allegations the employee...

The Estate of Samuel Keast v Playground Centre Limited [2026] NZERA 136 - preliminary decision: estate could not raise a new personal grievance after death; Australian entity was employer at the time; ERA lacked jurisdiction

Preliminary determination. The estate of a deceased employee sought to bring a personal grievance (including constructive dismissal) against a New Zealand company after he died at work in Melbourne. The Authority held the NZ employment had ended before the move to Australia, a separate...

Browse topics