A practical explanation of the statutory duty of good faith in s 4 of the Employment Relations Act, including active and constructive conduct, responsiveness, communication and disclosure before adverse decisions.
Unjustified disadvantage is a Personal Grievance (PG) where an employer takes unjustifiable action that disadvantages an employee or worsens the employee's conditions. This page explains the basics, common examples, time limits, evidence, and practical next steps.
Unjustified disadvantage is one of the most common personal grievance types in New Zealand. It covers a wide range of employer actions that worsen an employee's conditions or otherwise disadvantage them.
Under section 103(1)(b) of the Employment Relations Act 2000, a personal grievance includes a claim that the employee's employment or conditions were affected to the employee's disadvantage by some unjustifiable action by the employer.
In plain terms: if your employer does something that harms you at work (pay, duties, hours, treatment, discipline, safety, opportunities) and they cannot justify it, you may have an unjustified disadvantage grievance.
Most unjustified disadvantage disputes are not about whether the employee was unhappy. They turn on whether the employer's action (and the process used) was fair and reasonable in the circumstances.
A practical warning: where the dispute is really about interpreting a clause in the employment agreement, it may be treated as an interpretation dispute rather than an unjustified disadvantage claim. The framing matters.
For most personal grievances, you generally must raise the grievance with the employer within 90 days of the action happening or coming to your notice (whichever is later). There are limited pathways for late grievances, but do not rely on them.
Subject: Personal grievance - unjustified disadvantage
I am raising a personal grievance (PG) for unjustified disadvantage. The disadvantage is: [briefly describe what happened]. The key dates are: [dates]. The outcome I want is: [what you are seeking]. Please confirm you have received this and advise the next steps.
Many unjustified disadvantage disputes resolve by agreement (often at MBIE mediation). Depending on the facts, outcomes can include changes to the employer record, compensation, and practical fixes.
Unjustified disadvantage claims are often a process audit. If you are responding as an employer, focus on the record and keep the process tight.
A practical explanation of the statutory duty of good faith in s 4 of the Employment Relations Act, including active and constructive conduct, responsiveness, communication and disclosure before adverse decisions.
When workplace suspension is justified, the consultation and contractual issues employers should consider, and how an unnecessary or unfair suspension can become a separate unjustified-disadvantage grievance.
What workplace bullying means in New Zealand, the difference between repeated unreasonable behaviour and ordinary conflict or performance management, and the evidence and legal options available to an affected employee.
A consolidated guide to the Employment Relations Amendment Act 2026: commencement dates, changes to personal-grievance remedies and contribution, and the transitional question of which law applies to a particular dispute.
Lindisfarne College dismissed long-serving IT manager Kevin Whelan after a serious comment to students while showing CCTV footage of an accident. Although the misconduct could justify dismissal, the College paid four weeks in lieu rather than complying with the collective agreement's one-month notice mechanism or properly invoking instant dismissal.
Auckland Transport investigated FHE over serious conduct involving a former employee with whom he had been in a relationship. Before completing a fair consultation process over suspension, AT had already effectively removed him from work for two days.
Deborah Coley's agreement guaranteed at least 32 hours each week, but Bupa sought to vary that guarantee by averaging hours across a six-week roster and presented redundancy as the alternative if she refused. A later disciplinary investigation and written warning added a second strand to the disadvantage claim.
Hamilton Zoo's former senior manager subjected zookeeper Ashleigh Sanders to intrusive personal contact, out-of-hours messages, requests for information about colleagues, favouritism and career-related pressure. She later resigned, long after that manager had left.