NZ 90-day trial period law explained. If the trial clause or notice is defective, you may still raise a Personal Grievance (PG) for unjustified dismissal. Check common mistakes.
NZ 90 day trial periods explained for employers and employees. When a trial can block an unjustified dismissal Personal Grievance (PG), and the common mistakes that make trials invalid.
A valid 90 day trial period can prevent a Personal Grievance (PG) for unjustified dismissal. However, the legal requirements are strict. Small drafting or timing errors often invalidate a trial clause and can reopen an unfair dismissal claim.
Trial periods are governed by section 67A of the Employment Relations Act 2000. If the trial is valid, an employee cannot bring a PG or legal proceedings about dismissal. The employer must still meet minimum legal obligations (pay, leave, good faith, health and safety, and prohibited conduct rules).
These are common failure points we see in practice:
Even with a correctly drafted clause, employers often get the notice process wrong. Notice must be issued within the trial period and must comply with the agreement's requirements.
Notice must be given during the trial period. The last day of employment can fall after the trial ends, as long as notice was delivered in time.
A trial period only removes dismissal challenge rights, and only if it is valid. Depending on the facts, other claims can still exist, including:
A probationary period is different. Employers generally must still have good reasons and follow a fair process to dismiss during probation. A trial period (if valid) can limit dismissal challenge rights, but only for dismissal and only if the statutory requirements are met.
Trial period risk is usually created by onboarding errors and sloppy notice. We can review your agreements and templates, and help you implement a repeatable hiring and termination process.
Employer advice and dispute defenceThe fastest way is to submit the case form with a short timeline and key documents. We will assess whether the trial was valid and what your best next step is.
Employee Case FormNZ 90-day trial period law explained. If the trial clause or notice is defective, you may still raise a Personal Grievance (PG) for unjustified dismissal. Check common mistakes.
In George King v Off the Wall Construction Ltd [2026] NZERA 14, the ERA held the 90-day trial was invalid because the employee had already worked (and been paid) before signing. The dismissal was unjustified and the Authority awarded lost wages and compensation.
An ERA finding of unjustified dismissal where the employer tried to rely on a trial period clause that did not meet s 67A requirements and then failed to engage with the Authority's investigation. The Authority ordered $30,087.30 gross including $13,056 lost remuneration, $10,000 distress...
A costs determination was made. On 19 April 2024 Ms Wilkins said she received a telephone call from Murdoch Razmi during which they discussed her being interviewed for the position of Store Manager which DDGH considered her skills more applicable.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful). Mr Lazaro says that in a meeting on 4 December 2023 WCC dismissed him.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Determination: 28 July 2025 DETERMINATION OF THE AUTHORITY Employment Relationship Problem [1] The Applicant, Mr Gillard claims he was unjustifiably dismissed by his former employer (SSM).
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful). On 12 May 2022 MOVe Freight terminated Mr Putaanga's employment.