ClickCease

Results for personal grievance

Showing 17-24 of 363 results
CHENG v THE VICE CHANCELLOR OF LINCOLN UNIVERSITY [2025] NZERA 167 - personal grievance partly successful; compensation and lost wages

Ms Cheng's case against Lincoln University involved several employment grievances and required the ERA to distinguish the claims that were made out from those that were not. The resulting orders included both compensation and a wage-related remedy rather than an across-the-board finding for either party.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
HILL v TAMAKI LABOUR HIRE LIMITED [2025] NZERA 100 - personal grievance partly successful; remedies limited to proven breaches

Mr Hill challenged the ending of his employment with Tamaki Labour Hire and associated treatment during the employment relationship. The case required the ERA to separate the parts of his grievance that were established from claims for which the evidence did not justify relief.

Matched passage: Decision markers Ms Hill has established she had a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.
BLIGNAUT v WASTE MANAGEMENT NZ LIMITED [2025] NZERA 560 - The personal grievance for unjustified disadvantage was upheld.

Mr Blignaut challenged Waste Management's treatment of him during a workplace conflict, including alleged bullying, suspension and pressure to resign, before he was ultimately dismissed for alleged serious misconduct. The ERA considered both the pre-dismissal disadvantage claims and the termination itself.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 560 Registry: Auckland Parties: BLIGNAUT v WASTE MANAGEMENT NZ LIMITED Authority member: Sarah Blick Hearing date: 25-27 March and 12 May 2025 (4 days) Outcome: The personal grievance for unjustified disadvantage was upheld.
Workplace bullying in New Zealand: what it is and what you can do

What workplace bullying means in New Zealand, the difference between repeated unreasonable behaviour and ordinary conflict or performance management, and the evidence and legal options available to an affected employee.

Matched passage: Personal grievance time limit: most personal grievances must be raised within 90 days of the relevant action.
THING v SOUTH POLE IP HOLDING (NZ) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 142 - dismissal theory fails in part but disadvantage grievance succeeds

Ms Thing's dispute with South Pole IP Holding concerned whether the end of her employment was a dismissal or resignation and whether the employer's earlier conduct had unjustifiably disadvantaged her. The case required the ERA to distinguish direct or constructive dismissal from separate disadvantage grievances.

Matched passage: On 13 June 2023, Ms Thing's representative wrote to South Pole raising personal grievances for (quoted wording omitted).
Yu Chunyan, Sun Tingting, Liu Danhua, Zhang Shijie v Miaodi's Laundromat Ltd t/a Mr Suds and Yang Yang [2026] NZERA 31 - Unjustified dismissal, wage arrears, compensation and penalty

Four workers at Miaodi's Laundromat alleged their employment was ended without a fair process and that significant wage and holiday entitlements had not been paid. The proceeding also involved personal liability and penalties for minimum employment-standard breaches.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.

Browse topics