ClickCease

Workplace bullying in New Zealand: what it is and what you can do

Bullying at work is usually repeated, unreasonable behaviour that creates a risk to health and safety. Here is what to document, how to raise it, and what legal options can apply.


Workplace bullying: what it is and what you can do

Updated 1 March 2026 (NZ).

General information only. This is not legal advice for your specific situation. If you are in immediate danger or feel unsafe, call emergency services.

1) What is workplace bullying?

In plain language, workplace bullying is usually not a single awkward conversation or a manager raising performance issues. It is typically a pattern of behaviour that is repeated, unreasonable, and creates a risk to a worker's health and safety.

It often shows up as a mix of: put-downs, intimidation, humiliation, threats, spreading rumours, deliberately setting someone up to fail, or sabotaging their work. It can be overt (yelling, swearing) or covert (exclusion, undermining, setting unrealistic deadlines, constantly shifting expectations).

Bullying is frequently cumulative. Targets often tolerate it for a long time before they realise how bad the pattern has become.

Bullying vs "tough management"

Employers can manage performance, set expectations, and issue reasonable instructions. The difference is the way it is done and whether it becomes repeated, unreasonable behaviour that causes harm or creates a risk of harm.

2) Why bullying matters legally

New Zealand employment law looks at bullying through a few overlapping lenses:

  • Health and safety. Psychological health matters. Employers must eliminate risks to health and safety, so far as is reasonably practicable, or otherwise minimise those risks. Workers also have duties to not endanger others.
  • Employment relationship obligations. An employer must be a fair and reasonable employer and act in good faith. If an employer fails to keep someone safe, that can be an unjustified disadvantage (and sometimes constructive dismissal).
  • Contractual duty of a safe workplace. A safe workplace duty is implied into employment agreements. That can support claims where bullying or unsafe conditions cause stress or psychological harm.

Key point

Stress-related harm caused by working conditions (including bullying) can create real legal exposure for an employer. These cases often turn on foreseeability (what the employer knew or should have known) and whether reasonable steps were taken.

3) What you can do if you are being bullied

Step 1: Document it properly

Evidence wins disputes. Start now. Keep a clear log and preserve documents.

  • Incident log: date, time, who, what happened, where, who witnessed it, and how it affected you.
  • Save communications: emails, messages, rosters, performance notes, diary invites, meeting notes.
  • Medical evidence: if you have stress symptoms, see your GP and keep copies (do not wait until the end).
  • Work impacts: changes to duties, hours, targets, warnings, exclusion from meetings, or loss of opportunities.

Step 2: Raise it (in writing) and be specific

Many bullying cases fail because the complaint is too vague. If you want an employer to investigate, you need concrete examples. Your complaint should:

  • List the main incidents (with dates) and describe the pattern.
  • Explain why it is unreasonable and how it is affecting your health, dignity, and ability to work.
  • Ask the employer to confirm what process will be used (policy, investigator, timelines, interim safety steps).
  • Request interim controls if needed (different reporting line, separation on rosters, no direct contact, etc).
Tip: If you are struggling to put it together, we can draft the complaint so it is clear, specific, and framed around what a fair and reasonable employer should do.

Step 3: Protect your position and your deadlines

  • Do not resign in the heat of the moment. Resigning can be used against you unless the situation is so bad that resignation was the only reasonable option. Get advice before you do anything irreversible.
  • Personal grievance time limit: most personal grievances must be raised within 90 days of the relevant action. If the bullying is ongoing, you should still act quickly.
  • Ask for safety measures now: a good employer should reduce foreseeable risk while investigating.

Step 4: Escalation options

Depending on the facts, possible pathways include:

  • Internal process: using the employer policy, HR, senior management, or an independent investigator.
  • Personal grievance: unjustified disadvantage and, in some cases, constructive dismissal.
  • Mediation: many disputes settle with an agreed exit, compensation, and a neutral reference.
  • Health and safety: where there is risk to health (including psychological health), WorkSafe processes may be relevant.

4) What employers should do (if you are reading this as a manager)

The safest employers do the basics well:

  • Have a clear bullying policy and train managers on it.
  • Act early when concerns are raised. Delay makes harm worse and increases legal risk.
  • Separate the parties where needed to prevent further harm while investigating.
  • Run a fair process for both sides. Specific allegations, right of response, and proper records matter.
  • Do not retaliate against a complainant (for example, by isolating them, targeting them with discipline, or cutting hours).

5) Common mistakes that blow up a bullying case

  • No evidence: the story is believable but cannot be proved.
  • Vague complaint: "I feel bullied" without examples and dates.
  • Waiting too long: health deteriorates and deadlines are missed.
  • Resigning too early: without giving the employer a chance to fix the situation (context dependent).
  • Mixing issues: performance management disputes get framed as bullying without separating facts and tone.

6) How we can help

If you are dealing with workplace bullying, we can:

  • Turn your notes into a clear, specific written complaint.
  • Advise on immediate safety steps to request.
  • Raise a Personal Grievance (PG) and run the process through mediation and the Employment Relations Authority (ERA).
  • Negotiate exits, compensation, and reference terms (including enforceable settlement documentation).
Employee Case Form
If your issue is bullying / disadvantage rather than dismissal, use the form anyway and note that in the background section.

Legal references (selected)

0800 WIN KIWI

Search
Search articles and guides.
Tip: press / to search

Related articles

Browse all articles
Based on: Unjustified Disadvantage
Nicholas Gordon Pilcher v Brandt Tractor Limited [2026] NZERA 273 - dismissal for untested bullying complaints held unjustified; de facto suspension unjustified; $19,360 compensation + 4 months' lost pay

A sales manager was put on 'special leave' while four bullying/harassment complaints were being investigated, but his phone and laptop were taken and he was removed from the workplace without prior consultation. Five days later he was dismissed for serious misconduct without being given the...

Daniel Bly v FutureCo Limited [2026] NZERA 269 - dismissal for Instagram posts and Slack messages held unjustified; $15,000 compensation; 6 months' pay less 50% contribution

A lead developer on a high-pressure KFC app project posted about exhaustion on Instagram and sent blunt messages to a junior developer. FutureCo treated this as serious misconduct and dismissed him. The ERA held the dismissal unjustified, found excessive hours were an unjustified disadvantage,...

Phil Jacklin v Planit Software Testing Limited [2026] NZERA 264 - bonus clause held discretionary; KPI delay breached contract; $10,000 unjustified disadvantage award

A general manager resigned after months of dispute about a short term incentive (STI) clause. He believed he was entitled to 25% of salary, paid quarterly, and that KPIs had to be issued by 1 April. The ERA rejected the constructive dismissal claim because the STI was discretionary and annual,...

Gregory Brian Clarke v Omni Health Limited [2026] NZERA 265 - redundancy substantively justified, but process unfair; $10,000 compensation for disadvantage

Omni Health disestablished its chief operating officer role in a cost-cutting restructure after cashflow pressure and declining profitability. The ERA accepted the redundancy was genuine and redeployment was not realistic, so the dismissal was substantively justified. However, multiple process...

Browse topics