ClickCease

Workplace bullying in New Zealand: what it is and what you can do

Bullying at work is usually repeated, unreasonable behaviour that creates a risk to health and safety. Here is what to document, how to raise it, and what legal options can apply.


Workplace bullying: what it is and what you can do

Updated 1 March 2026 (NZ).

General information only. This is not legal advice for your specific situation. If you are in immediate danger or feel unsafe, call emergency services.

1) What is workplace bullying?

In plain language, workplace bullying is usually not a single awkward conversation or a manager raising performance issues. It is typically a pattern of behaviour that is repeated, unreasonable, and creates a risk to a worker's health and safety.

It often shows up as a mix of: put-downs, intimidation, humiliation, threats, spreading rumours, deliberately setting someone up to fail, or sabotaging their work. It can be overt (yelling, swearing) or covert (exclusion, undermining, setting unrealistic deadlines, constantly shifting expectations).

Bullying is frequently cumulative. Targets often tolerate it for a long time before they realise how bad the pattern has become.

Bullying vs "tough management"

Employers can manage performance, set expectations, and issue reasonable instructions. The difference is the way it is done and whether it becomes repeated, unreasonable behaviour that causes harm or creates a risk of harm.

2) Why bullying matters legally

New Zealand employment law looks at bullying through a few overlapping lenses:

  • Health and safety. Psychological health matters. Employers must eliminate risks to health and safety, so far as is reasonably practicable, or otherwise minimise those risks. Workers also have duties to not endanger others.
  • Employment relationship obligations. An employer must be a fair and reasonable employer and act in good faith. If an employer fails to keep someone safe, that can be an unjustified disadvantage (and sometimes constructive dismissal).
  • Contractual duty of a safe workplace. A safe workplace duty is implied into employment agreements. That can support claims where bullying or unsafe conditions cause stress or psychological harm.

Key point

Stress-related harm caused by working conditions (including bullying) can create real legal exposure for an employer. These cases often turn on foreseeability (what the employer knew or should have known) and whether reasonable steps were taken.

3) What you can do if you are being bullied

Step 1: Document it properly

Evidence wins disputes. Start now. Keep a clear log and preserve documents.

  • Incident log: date, time, who, what happened, where, who witnessed it, and how it affected you.
  • Save communications: emails, messages, rosters, performance notes, diary invites, meeting notes.
  • Medical evidence: if you have stress symptoms, see your GP and keep copies (do not wait until the end).
  • Work impacts: changes to duties, hours, targets, warnings, exclusion from meetings, or loss of opportunities.

Step 2: Raise it (in writing) and be specific

Many bullying cases fail because the complaint is too vague. If you want an employer to investigate, you need concrete examples. Your complaint should:

  • List the main incidents (with dates) and describe the pattern.
  • Explain why it is unreasonable and how it is affecting your health, dignity, and ability to work.
  • Ask the employer to confirm what process will be used (policy, investigator, timelines, interim safety steps).
  • Request interim controls if needed (different reporting line, separation on rosters, no direct contact, etc).
Tip: If you are struggling to put it together, we can draft the complaint so it is clear, specific, and framed around what a fair and reasonable employer should do.

Step 3: Protect your position and your deadlines

  • Do not resign in the heat of the moment. Resigning can be used against you unless the situation is so bad that resignation was the only reasonable option. Get advice before you do anything irreversible.
  • Personal grievance time limit: most personal grievances must be raised within 90 days of the relevant action. If the bullying is ongoing, you should still act quickly.
  • Ask for safety measures now: a good employer should reduce foreseeable risk while investigating.

Step 4: Escalation options

Depending on the facts, possible pathways include:

  • Internal process: using the employer policy, HR, senior management, or an independent investigator.
  • Personal grievance: unjustified disadvantage and, in some cases, constructive dismissal.
  • Mediation: many disputes settle with an agreed exit, compensation, and a neutral reference.
  • Health and safety: where there is risk to health (including psychological health), WorkSafe processes may be relevant.

4) What employers should do (if you are reading this as a manager)

The safest employers do the basics well:

  • Have a clear bullying policy and train managers on it.
  • Act early when concerns are raised. Delay makes harm worse and increases legal risk.
  • Separate the parties where needed to prevent further harm while investigating.
  • Run a fair process for both sides. Specific allegations, right of response, and proper records matter.
  • Do not retaliate against a complainant (for example, by isolating them, targeting them with discipline, or cutting hours).

5) Common mistakes that blow up a bullying case

  • No evidence: the story is believable but cannot be proved.
  • Vague complaint: "I feel bullied" without examples and dates.
  • Waiting too long: health deteriorates and deadlines are missed.
  • Resigning too early: without giving the employer a chance to fix the situation (context dependent).
  • Mixing issues: performance management disputes get framed as bullying without separating facts and tone.

6) How we can help

If you are dealing with workplace bullying, we can:

  • Turn your notes into a clear, specific written complaint.
  • Advise on immediate safety steps to request.
  • Raise a Personal Grievance (PG) and run the process through mediation and the Employment Relations Authority (ERA).
  • Negotiate exits, compensation, and reference terms (including enforceable settlement documentation).
Employee Case Form
If your issue is bullying / disadvantage rather than dismissal, use the form anyway and note that in the background section.

Legal references (selected)

0800 WIN KIWI

Search
Search articles and guides.
Tip: press / to search

Related articles

Browse all articles
Based on: Unjustified Disadvantage
Ashleigh Sanders v Hamilton City Council [2026] NZERA 517 - senior zoo manager's insidious conduct caused unjustified disadvantage

The ERA found Hamilton City Council liable for unjustified disadvantage caused by the conduct of Hamilton Zoo's former senior manager towards zookeeper Ashleigh Sanders. The conduct involved intrusive personal contact, out-of-hours messages, requests for information about colleagues, favouritism and career-related pressure, and came close to sexual harassment. Constructive dismissal was not established because the manager had left 14 months before the resignation and causation was not proved. The Council was ordered to pay $18,000 compensation.

Nirali Bhatt v Prishal Limited, Utkarsh Deota and Vishal Patel [2026] NZERA 492 - unpaid wages caused unjustified disadvantage

Nirali Bhatt moved from India to New Zealand with her two children to work for Prishal Limited at Juice Heist. The ERA found that Prishal failed to pay her in full despite her raising the issue, did not produce compliant wage and time records, and unjustifiably disadvantaged her. Prishal was ordered to pay wage, holiday and public-holiday arrears, $10,000 compensation, interest, a $1,000 penalty and the filing fee.

FEC v HES [2026] NZERA 475 - constructive dismissal failed but unjustified disadvantage found over home visits

FEC was a beginning principal at a small school. She resigned in August 2023, later claiming she had been constructively dismissed because the school board failed to provide a safe and healthy workplace and failed to support her after an incident involving a parent. The ERA rejected constructive dismissal, finding the school was entitled to rely on the reason given in the resignation letter. However, the Authority found unjustified disadvantage because the board's presiding member twice visited FEC at her home after hours, without prior consent, to deal with school business in circumstances where she had raised safety concerns and was under significant stress. HES was ordered to pay $10,000 compensation...

Brent Colyer v New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited [2026] NZERA 444 - flawed disciplinary process, written warning and unjustified disadvantage

Brent Colyer had worked for New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited as an electrician for almost 20 years. After he inspected a gantry crane without first isolating a related 35-tonne crane, NZAS investigated and issued a written warning. The ERA found the disciplinary process was unjustified and breached good faith. NZAS had blurred an informal incident investigation into a disciplinary investigation, failed to collect basic statements, allowed an uninvestigated concern about Mr Colyer's attitude toward a colleague to become central, failed to provide the correct investigation report in advance, and then accidentally gave him a draft report containing an outcomes section. Constructive dismissal failed, but unjustified disadvantage succeeded. NZAS was ordered to pay $18,000 compensation...

Browse topics