ClickCease

Workplace bullying in New Zealand: what it is and what you can do

Bullying at work is usually repeated, unreasonable behaviour that creates a risk to health and safety. Here is what to document, how to raise it, and what legal options can apply.


Workplace bullying: what it is and what you can do

Updated 1 March 2026 (NZ).

General information only. This is not legal advice for your specific situation. If you are in immediate danger or feel unsafe, call emergency services.

1) What is workplace bullying?

In plain language, workplace bullying is usually not a single awkward conversation or a manager raising performance issues. It is typically a pattern of behaviour that is repeated, unreasonable, and creates a risk to a worker's health and safety.

It often shows up as a mix of: put-downs, intimidation, humiliation, threats, spreading rumours, deliberately setting someone up to fail, or sabotaging their work. It can be overt (yelling, swearing) or covert (exclusion, undermining, setting unrealistic deadlines, constantly shifting expectations).

Bullying is frequently cumulative. Targets often tolerate it for a long time before they realise how bad the pattern has become.

Bullying vs "tough management"

Employers can manage performance, set expectations, and issue reasonable instructions. The difference is the way it is done and whether it becomes repeated, unreasonable behaviour that causes harm or creates a risk of harm.

2) Why bullying matters legally

New Zealand employment law looks at bullying through a few overlapping lenses:

  • Health and safety. Psychological health matters. Employers must eliminate risks to health and safety, so far as is reasonably practicable, or otherwise minimise those risks. Workers also have duties to not endanger others.
  • Employment relationship obligations. An employer must be a fair and reasonable employer and act in good faith. If an employer fails to keep someone safe, that can be an unjustified disadvantage (and sometimes constructive dismissal).
  • Contractual duty of a safe workplace. A safe workplace duty is implied into employment agreements. That can support claims where bullying or unsafe conditions cause stress or psychological harm.

Key point

Stress-related harm caused by working conditions (including bullying) can create real legal exposure for an employer. These cases often turn on foreseeability (what the employer knew or should have known) and whether reasonable steps were taken.

3) What you can do if you are being bullied

Step 1: Document it properly

Evidence wins disputes. Start now. Keep a clear log and preserve documents.

  • Incident log: date, time, who, what happened, where, who witnessed it, and how it affected you.
  • Save communications: emails, messages, rosters, performance notes, diary invites, meeting notes.
  • Medical evidence: if you have stress symptoms, see your GP and keep copies (do not wait until the end).
  • Work impacts: changes to duties, hours, targets, warnings, exclusion from meetings, or loss of opportunities.

Step 2: Raise it (in writing) and be specific

Many bullying cases fail because the complaint is too vague. If you want an employer to investigate, you need concrete examples. Your complaint should:

  • List the main incidents (with dates) and describe the pattern.
  • Explain why it is unreasonable and how it is affecting your health, dignity, and ability to work.
  • Ask the employer to confirm what process will be used (policy, investigator, timelines, interim safety steps).
  • Request interim controls if needed (different reporting line, separation on rosters, no direct contact, etc).
Tip: If you are struggling to put it together, we can draft the complaint so it is clear, specific, and framed around what a fair and reasonable employer should do.

Step 3: Protect your position and your deadlines

  • Do not resign in the heat of the moment. Resigning can be used against you unless the situation is so bad that resignation was the only reasonable option. Get advice before you do anything irreversible.
  • Personal grievance time limit: most personal grievances must be raised within 90 days of the relevant action. If the bullying is ongoing, you should still act quickly.
  • Ask for safety measures now: a good employer should reduce foreseeable risk while investigating.

Step 4: Escalation options

Depending on the facts, possible pathways include:

  • Internal process: using the employer policy, HR, senior management, or an independent investigator.
  • Personal grievance: unjustified disadvantage and, in some cases, constructive dismissal.
  • Mediation: many disputes settle with an agreed exit, compensation, and a neutral reference.
  • Health and safety: where there is risk to health (including psychological health), WorkSafe processes may be relevant.

4) What employers should do (if you are reading this as a manager)

The safest employers do the basics well:

  • Have a clear bullying policy and train managers on it.
  • Act early when concerns are raised. Delay makes harm worse and increases legal risk.
  • Separate the parties where needed to prevent further harm while investigating.
  • Run a fair process for both sides. Specific allegations, right of response, and proper records matter.
  • Do not retaliate against a complainant (for example, by isolating them, targeting them with discipline, or cutting hours).

5) Common mistakes that blow up a bullying case

  • No evidence: the story is believable but cannot be proved.
  • Vague complaint: "I feel bullied" without examples and dates.
  • Waiting too long: health deteriorates and deadlines are missed.
  • Resigning too early: without giving the employer a chance to fix the situation (context dependent).
  • Mixing issues: performance management disputes get framed as bullying without separating facts and tone.

6) How we can help

If you are dealing with workplace bullying, we can:

  • Turn your notes into a clear, specific written complaint.
  • Advise on immediate safety steps to request.
  • Raise a Personal Grievance (PG) and run the process through mediation and the Employment Relations Authority (ERA).
  • Negotiate exits, compensation, and reference terms (including enforceable settlement documentation).
Employee Case Form
If your issue is bullying / disadvantage rather than dismissal, use the form anyway and note that in the background section.

Legal references (selected)

0800 WIN KIWI

Search
Search articles and guides.
Tip: press / to search

Related articles

Browse all articles
Based on: Unjustified Disadvantage
Brent Colyer v New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited [2026] NZERA 444 - flawed disciplinary process, written warning and unjustified disadvantage

Brent Colyer had worked for New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited as an electrician for almost 20 years. After he inspected a gantry crane without first isolating a related 35-tonne crane, NZAS investigated and issued a written warning. The ERA found the disciplinary process was unjustified and breached good faith. NZAS had blurred an informal incident investigation into a disciplinary investigation, failed to collect basic statements, allowed an uninvestigated concern about Mr Colyer's attitude toward a colleague to become central, failed to provide the correct investigation report in advance, and then accidentally gave him a draft report containing an outcomes section. Constructive dismissal failed, but unjustified disadvantage succeeded. NZAS was ordered to pay $18,000 compensation...

Amanda Bradley v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [2026] NZERA 441 - FireSuper eligibility and poor communication

Amanda Bradley, a Manager Region Training for Fire and Emergency New Zealand, could not establish that her collective agreement gave automatic entry to the FireSuper scheme. The ERA found that eligibility was conditional upon the FireSuper Trust Deed or the Trustees' discretion, and it could not direct FENZ to confer rank or classify the MRT role as Black Watch. But the Authority found FENZ had significant influence over FireSuper eligibility and handled Ms Bradley's enquiries in a poor, slow, inconsistent and confusing manner. That was an unjustified disadvantage and a breach of good faith. Ms Bradley was awarded $5,000 compensation, with no contribution reduction...

Emma Baldwin v RJ Hospitality Solutions Limited [2026] NZERA 413 - unilateral roster changes after parental leave

Emma Baldwin returned from parental leave to find that RJ Hospitality Solutions Limited had changed the days and hours she had consistently worked for more than two years, provided fewer than her 20 guaranteed hours, and did so without a workplace-change proposal or consultation. The ERA rejected the dismissal and bullying claims, but found an unjustified disadvantage. It awarded $15,000 compensation, 15.5 hours' wage arrears, and any outstanding annual-leave arrears...

Four Applicants v A Respondent [2026] NZERA 407 - union activity discrimination, duress, and work-from-home disadvantage

In this non-publication determination, four salaried union members established personal grievances for unjustified disadvantage arising from discrimination and duress connected with their union activity. The Authority found that a senior manager held one-on-one meetings in which the applicants were told that strike action and delegate roles harmed their job security and career prospects. A temporary decision to deny striking employees access to discretionary work from home arrangements was also discriminatory. Each applicant was awarded $10,000 compensation, with no reduction for contribution.

Browse topics