ClickCease

Results for unfair dismissal

Showing 225-232 of 266 results
KCY v XSH [2026] NZERA 516 - bullying complaint failures, forced transfer and dismissal over promotional gifts

Retail employee KCY complained of bullying linked to her Russian ethnicity, was placed on paid leave without proper consultation and directed to transfer stores immediately. She was later summarily dismissed over expired promotional gifts and disclosure of a back-office code.

Matched passage: The Employment Relations Authority found three unjustified disadvantages and an unjustified dismissal.
George King v Off the Wall Construction Ltd [2026] NZERA 14 - 90-day trial invalid, unjustified dismissal

George King was dismissed by Off the Wall Construction under a purported 90-day trial. The decisive issue was timing: he had already performed paid work before signing the agreement containing the trial provision.

Matched passage: Mr King raised a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal and sought lost wages, compensation for hurt and humiliation, and the cost of tools.
Hurikawa v Walton Mountain Ltd [2026] NZERA 8 - Unjustified dismissal and remedies

Hurikawa was abruptly told he was 'finished' by Walton Mountain without a stated reason, warning or opportunity to respond. The ERA therefore had to assess a direct verbal termination against the minimum substantive and procedural requirements in s 103A.

Matched passage: If you are dealing with an unjustified dismissal claim or need representation at mediation / the ERA, we can assist with strategy, drafting, and settlement.
Yusong Du v Sly House Limited [2025] NZERA 765 - WeChat dismissal and 50% contribution reduction

Sly House sent migrant construction worker Yusong Du a WeChat message saying he was unsuitable because he was too slow and lacked strength, then argued he had abandoned the job. The ERA also considered evidence that he had overstated his prior work experience.

Matched passage: The ERA rejected that account, found the message was a dismissal, and held the dismissal unjustified because no disciplinary or contractual termination process had been followed.
Cameron Wong v Obers Brothers Construction Limited (in liquidation) [2025] NZERA 713 - dismissal, unpaid leave and $17,500 compensation

Painter Cameron Wong was told to pack his belongings and leave after a workplace confrontation, then received only part of his final entitlements. Obers Brothers Construction, already in liquidation, did not participate in the ERA investigation.

Matched passage: The ERA found the dismissal unjustified and made awards for unpaid holiday entitlements, notice, lost wages and hurt and humiliation.
Siddanth Prasad & Ors v Fiji Food Distributors NZ Limited [2025] NZERA 659 - wage arrears, unjustified dismissal and $32,000 compensation each

Four Krazy Price Mart employees said they routinely worked about 60 hours over six days while being paid for substantially fewer hours and were later dismissed when the business was sold without adequate consultation. The case combined personal grievances with extensive minimum-entitlement claims.

Matched passage: ... 20 October 2025 Successful claims: wage arrears, unjustified disadvantage and unjustified dismissal Compensation: $32,000 to each of four applicants Contribution: no reduction Costs: reserved The workers' hours and the employer's records The applicants said they ...
Leo Waters v S.T.L Linehaul Ltd [2021] NZERA 304 - Unjustified dismissal, redundancy process failures

Leo Waters was made redundant by STL Linehaul in a process he said lacked genuine consultation and a fair opportunity to influence the decision. The ERA examined both the employer's business rationale and whether the redundancy procedure met the good-faith and justification standards.

Matched passage: ... 2021 and 19 April 2021 Role: Administration assistant Employment start: Late August 2019 Dismissal basis claimed by employer: Redundancy Applicant representative: Lawrence Anderson (advocate) Direct link to the full ERA determination (PDF): What happened Mr Waters started ...
Jasmine Woollett v Commissioner of Police [2026] NZERA 53 - Fiji deployment recall and unfair process; $21,000 compensation

Senior Sergeant Jasmine Woollett challenged decisions surrounding her Fiji deployment, including her recall and the process Police used after her working relationship with a deployment manager deteriorated. Her claim was for unjustified disadvantage rather than dismissal.

Matched passage: Employee Unfair Dismissal Case Form Read the full ERA determination (embedded) If the embedded PDF does not load on your device, use the button below to open it in a new tab.

Browse topics