ClickCease

Results for final pay

Showing 65-72 of 223 results
BRENNAN v STELLA 2020 LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 449 - dismissal without fair process; compensation and lost wages

Ms Brennan's employment with Stella 2020 ended on 30 July 2024 without a fair disciplinary or dismissal process. The employer did not participate effectively in the ERA investigation, which proceeded on the evidence available to the Authority.

Matched passage: Having regard to the proactive steps appropriately taken by Ms Brennan, The Authority found that the loss was limited to five weeks wages.
BALI v R1i TECHNOLOGY LIMITED [2025] NZERA 409 - Webex dismissal without fair process

R1i Technology dismissed Mr Bali during a Webex meeting and then confirmed the decision in writing. The employer did not participate in the ERA proceeding and the evidence showed no meaningful process satisfying the minimum statutory tests of procedural fairness.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $17,500.
UDUMULLAGA v HOPKINS JOINERY LIMITED [2025] NZERA 270 - employer-prepared resignation and redundancy dismissal unjustified

Ms Udumullaga was presented with an employer-prepared resignation letter and was later told her job had already been disestablished. The dispute concerned redundancy, periods when she said she was fit and available to work, unpaid entitlements, and whether the employer's process was genuine and fair.

Matched passage: ... no position for her to return to. Ultimately, Ms Udumullaga seeks reimbursement of unpaid wages from 16 November 2023 when Ms Udumullaga says she was ready and willing to work as supported by her medical certificates, but was told by Hopkins not to attend work, through ...
WILLIAMS v LONGEVITY CONSTRUCTION LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 215 - redundancy substantively and procedurally unjustified

Mr Williams was told by email on 17 March 2024 that he had been made redundant immediately. He had not previously been told his job was in jeopardy, no supporting information accompanied the decision, and there had been no genuine consultation before the outcome was reached.

Matched passage: ) Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $25,000 Notice period pay: $10,465.
MCCANN v WINTON CAPITAL LIMITED [2025] NZERA 171 - constructive dismissal; substantial lost remuneration and compensation

Ms McCann resigned while on sick leave after conflict with Winton Capital, pressure around the employment relationship and removal of access to a senior executive's email and calendar. She alleged the cumulative conduct made continued employment untenable.

Matched passage: ) Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $25,000 Lost wages: $74,846.
ZHENG v EASTPAC CORP LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 149 - dismissal grievance raised in time; compensation and wage arrears

Ms Zheng worked for Eastpac and later disputed both the way her employment ended and substantial unpaid wages. A preliminary issue was whether her WeChat communications had raised an unjustified-dismissal grievance clearly enough and within the 90-day period.

Matched passage: 8 Holiday pay (which I take to be annual holiday pay at 8% of that gross amount) is owing, being $722.
KINZETT v FIRE AND EMERGENCY NEW ZEALAND [2025] NZERA 132 - dismissal unjustified; investigation disadvantages justified

Fire and Emergency New Zealand investigated complaints involving firefighter Russell Kinzett and two other firefighters before summarily dismissing him. Mr Kinzett challenged both the investigation process and the dismissal, and was later interim-reinstated.

Matched passage: ... [123] Mr Kinzett has established a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal. Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $9,600 Lost wages: A quantifiable amount "lost wages under s 123(1)(b) of the Act in respect of the period between his summary dismissal on 6 May 2024 ...
WYETH v HANSEN PRODUCTS (NZ) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 92 - unjustified dismissal

This costs determination followed Christopher Wyeth's partly successful employment case against Hansen Products. The dispute was whether costs should be reduced because he had rejected a $10,000 Calderbank settlement offer before the substantive determination.

Matched passage: ) Orders and payments mentioned Costs: $3,500.

Browse topics