WYETH v HANSEN PRODUCTS (NZ) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 92
This page summarises and embeds an Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination. It is not legal advice.
At a glance
- Citation: [2025] NZERA 92
- Registry: Auckland
- Parties: WYETH v HANSEN PRODUCTS (NZ) LIMITED
- Authority member: David Beck
- Investigation meeting: 9 September 2024 (Auckland)
- Determination date: 19 February 2025
- Outcome: Costs determination.
Story in plain English
This is a costs determination following earlier steps in an employment relationship problem.
In summary, Mr Wyeth was therefore only partially successful in his claims; • Mr Wyeth turned down a settlement offer of $10,000.00 made on a Calderbank basis on 23 May 2024.
Key case markers
- This determination comes from the Auckland registry.
- The parties are WYETH (employee) and HANSEN PRODUCTS (NZ) LIMITED (employer).
- Hearing date noted: .
- Authority member: .
Key events described
- Mr Wyeth was therefore only partially successful in his claims; • Mr Wyeth turned down a settlement offer of $10,000.00 made on a Calderbank basis on 23 May 2024.
Decision markers
(No decision markers were extracted automatically.)
Orders and payments mentioned
- Costs: $3,500.00
Note: figures above are extracted from the orders section (or the final orders wording). Check the PDF for full context and any gross/net directions.
Practical takeaways
- Dismissal justification is assessed through s 103A: what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances.
Read the full ERA determination (embedded)
If the embedded PDF does not load on your device, use the button below to open it in a new tab.
Mobile / tablet tip: Some browsers do not display embedded PDFs reliably. Use the "Open" button above.
Source: Employment Relations Authority determination hosted on determinations.era.govt.nz.
![Regina Rasheed v Commissioner of Zayed College for Girls [2026] NZERA 326 - school principal reinstated after unjustified dismissal](/Images/site/EmploymentAdvocatesAucklandCard.jpg)