ClickCease

Results for unpaid wages

Showing 241-248 of 360 results
Thomas Patrick Kenna v Anztec Limited [2026] NZERA 120 - redundancy found genuine but consultation defective; unjustified disadvantage; $15,000 compensation

Thomas Kenna was made redundant from Anztec after a restructuring that the ERA accepted had a genuine business basis. He challenged alleged predetermination and the employer's failure to proactively disclose information needed to understand and respond to the proposal.

Matched passage: The employment was the subject of an individual employment agreement for 40 hours per week and latterly Mr Kenna was paid $38.
Kyle Spencer v Modern Transport Engineers Limited [2026] NZERA 60 - dismissal unjustified due to non-minor process defects; $12,000 compensation and employer damages offset

Modern Transport Engineers had evidence capable of supporting serious-misconduct concerns against Kyle Spencer, while also counterclaiming for unauthorised private work and purchases. However, it stood him down early, relied on undisclosed staff discussions and ran a process carrying signs of predetermination.

Matched passage: Key orders: Employer to pay $12,000 compensation (after a 20% contribution reduction).
Andrea Lawson v Luxottica Retail New Zealand Limited [2026] NZERA 52 - investigation process disadvantages upheld; $15,000 compensation and $3,000 good faith penalty

Store manager Andrea Lawson challenged Luxottica's investigation and employment treatment after concerns were raised about store performance and policy compliance. Her case included disadvantage claims, dismissal allegations and an argument that the employer had failed to accommodate a medical condition.

Matched passage: In summary: Lost remuneration: an amount equal to one day's wages plus associated holiday pay and KiwiSaver entitlements (gross) for contractually required mediation attendance, payable within 28 days.
HARRY SAMPSON v LYTTELTON PORT COMPANY LIMITED [2026] NZERA 17 - Preliminary time limit ruling; grievance in time; mediation directed.

Harry Sampson's proceeding against Lyttelton Port Company raised a preliminary 90-day time-limit issue before the merits of his personal grievance could be investigated. The employer argued the grievance was out of time; Mr Sampson relied on the communications by which he said it had been raised.

Matched passage: After 18 February 2022, you will receive a final pay which will include any outstanding wages and leave entitlements and will be paid in the next available pay run.
KMW v ZIB Digital Limited [2025] NZERA 806 - redundancy consultation called a 'charade'; unjustified dismissal; $47,692.30 awarded

KMW was selected for redundancy by ZIB Digital after a process the employee said had been predetermined and gave consultation no real prospect of changing the outcome. The ERA examined the business rationale, the information provided and whether the consultation was genuine.

Matched passage: 30 gross lost wages (three months), payable within 28 days Background and the redundancy decision KMW started with ZIB in June 2022 in a full time, permanent role described in the agreement as "Marketing Manager - Australia New Zealand".
Glenice Cooper v Success Realty [2025] NZERA 782 - redundancy, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

After 21 years as a marketing manager, Glenice Cooper was dismissed for redundancy by Success Realty. By the investigation meeting the employer conceded the dismissal was unjustified, leaving the ERA to determine the proper level of lost remuneration, bonus and compensation.

Matched passage: Section 128 of the Act states that where the Authority has determined that an employee has a personal grievance, and has lost remuneration as a result of that personal grievance, order the employer to pay to the employee the lessor of a sum equal to that.
MON v ALLIED AUTO PARTS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 590 - dismissal by text unjustified; no contribution

Allied Auto Parts dismissed Mr Mon by text message and required him to work out two weeks' notice. The employer later relied on concerns about working from home and other matters, but no proper disciplinary or dismissal process had been carried out.

Matched passage: ... both parties agreeing that this had resulted in the deduction of monies from Mr Mon's final pay, rather than being the cause of his dismissal. Decision markers (as described by the Authority) Accordingly, The Authority found that Mr Mon's actions did not contribute to his ...
WEI v LANQUAN LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 491 - genuine redundancy but consultation inadequate

Ms Wei was made redundant from Lanquan after a downturn in architectural work. The ERA accepted the commercial need for redundancy but examined an abrupt process in which she was told the decision without meaningful prior consultation.

Matched passage: However, Ms Wei: (a) Was not paid for the three days she worked in 2023; (b) Was paid a total of $4,665.

Browse topics