ClickCease

Results for personal grievance

Showing 17-24 of 282 results
Thuy v Huynh [2025] NZERA 74 - 90-day trial failed; dismissal for seeking employment advice unjustified

A nail technician was dismissed during a purported 90-day trial after seeking advice about her employment rights. The employer had not complied with the notice requirement in its own trial clause.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Nirali Bhatt v Prishal Limited, Utkarsh Deota and Vishal Patel [2026] NZERA 492 - unpaid wages caused unjustified disadvantage

Nirali Bhatt moved from India to work for Prishal Limited at Juice Heist and later raised concerns that she was not being paid in full. The case involved disputed hours, deficient wage and time records and whether continuing underpayment after complaint caused a personal grievance as well as arrears.

Matched passage: Where an employer continues to underpay an employee after concerns are raised, the same conduct may also support an unjustified disadvantage grievance and compensation for resulting distress.
Shania Mackey v Shearing NZ Limited [2026] NZERA 146 - employer withheld s 149 settlement payments after alleged confidentiality breach; compliance ordered; penalties adjourned

Shania Mackey and Shearing NZ settled a personal grievance at mediation under s 149, requiring compensation, payment of representative fees and a certificate of service. The employer later withheld those obligations after hearing that Mackey had allegedly breached confidentiality.

Matched passage: The parties settled a personal grievance at mediation and the mediator certified the settlement under s 149 of the Employment Relations Act 2000.
Nan Jia and Huachao Hou v FX NZ Limited and Yingsi Wei [2026] NZERA 30 - unjustified disadvantage and dismissal

Construction workers Nan Jia and Huachao Hou alleged FX NZ made unlawful rent deductions from wages and failed to pay public-holiday, annual-leave and other minimum entitlements. Their case combined employment-standard claims with personal-grievance issues about the employer's treatment of them.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Juliet Hull v Sleaktek Limited and Robert Lawrence [2026] NZERA 579 - CEO wins dismissal and disadvantage claims

Sleaktek stopped paying chief executive Juliet Hull, pursued a redundancy process she said was predetermined and later raised serious-misconduct allegations that had not been fairly put to her. The case also concerned director Robert Lawrence's personal involvement.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
WATSON v ALCHEMY BUILDERS LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 265 - disadvantage claim fails but dismissal grievance succeeds

Mr Watson challenged a written warning and later alleged he was constructively dismissed after his relationship with Alchemy Builders deteriorated and he was removed from a workplace WhatsApp group. Timeliness affected the earlier disadvantage grievance.

Matched passage: After that, On 1 December 2023 Mr Watson's representative sent a personal grievance letter to ABL alleging unjustified disadvantage caused by the written warning ABL had issued him on 22 August 2023.
CALLEN v ALARON PRODUCTS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 165 - dismissal grievance allowed; compensation and lost wages awarded

Mr Callen's unjustified-dismissal grievance against Alaron Products was not formally filed in the Authority until after the ordinary 90-day raising period had become an issue. The case addressed whether the grievance could nevertheless proceed and what remedies followed from the dismissal claim.

Matched passage: After that, Mr Callen lodged an amended application in the Authority on 1 July 2024, seeking that the unjustified dismissal personal grievance be heard out of time.
ZHENG v EASTPAC CORP LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 149 - dismissal grievance raised in time; compensation and wage arrears

Ms Zheng worked for Eastpac and later disputed both the way her employment ended and substantial unpaid wages. A preliminary issue was whether her WeChat communications had raised an unjustified-dismissal grievance clearly enough and within the 90-day period.

Matched passage: Later, The Authority is satisfied that Ms Zheng's WeChat communications on 15 March 2021 was sufficient to raise a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal, even although the resolution she focused on was still the recovery of wage arrears she believed she was owed.

Browse topics