ClickCease

Results for unpaid wages

Showing 209-216 of 279 results
KMW v ZIB Digital Limited [2025] NZERA 806 - redundancy consultation called a 'charade'; unjustified dismissal; $47,692.30 awarded

KMW was selected for redundancy by ZIB Digital after a process the employee said had been predetermined and gave consultation no real prospect of changing the outcome. The ERA examined the business rationale, the information provided and whether the consultation was genuine.

Matched passage: 30 gross lost wages (three months), payable within 28 days Background and the redundancy decision KMW started with ZIB in June 2022 in a full time, permanent role described in the agreement as "Marketing Manager - Australia New Zealand".
Glenice Cooper v Success Realty [2025] NZERA 782 - redundancy, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

After 21 years as a marketing manager, Glenice Cooper was dismissed for redundancy by Success Realty. By the investigation meeting the employer conceded the dismissal was unjustified, leaving the ERA to determine the proper level of lost remuneration, bonus and compensation.

Matched passage: Section 128 of the Act states that where the Authority has determined that an employee has a personal grievance, and has lost remuneration as a result of that personal grievance, order the employer to pay to the employee the lessor of a sum equal to that.
MON v ALLIED AUTO PARTS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 590 - dismissal by text unjustified; no contribution

Allied Auto Parts dismissed Mr Mon by text message and required him to work out two weeks' notice. The employer later relied on concerns about working from home and other matters, but no proper disciplinary or dismissal process had been carried out.

Matched passage: ... both parties agreeing that this had resulted in the deduction of monies from Mr Mon's final pay, rather than being the cause of his dismissal. Decision markers (as described by the Authority) Accordingly, The Authority found that Mr Mon's actions did not contribute to his ...
WEI v LANQUAN LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 491 - genuine redundancy but consultation inadequate

Ms Wei was made redundant from Lanquan after a downturn in architectural work. The ERA accepted the commercial need for redundancy but examined an abrupt process in which she was told the decision without meaningful prior consultation.

Matched passage: However, Ms Wei: (a) Was not paid for the three days she worked in 2023; (b) Was paid a total of $4,665.
PRASAD v WARRIOR NZ LIMITED [2025] NZERA 492 - employer breaches caused constructive dismissal

Mr Prasad's employment with Warrior NZ deteriorated after employer breaches and a breakdown in the working relationship. The employer did not attend the ERA investigation meeting despite being served with the proceeding.

Matched passage: The Authority notes that After the Authority's investigation meeting Mr Prasad provided a screenshot of his final payslip from his employment with the employer, as well as his Inland Revenue Department record of earnings for the period 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2022.
RAINA v HALL'S REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 469 - disciplinary process and dismissal procedurally unfair

Mr Raina faced disciplinary action by Hall's Refrigerated Transport, including a meeting invitation that did not tell him he could bring a support person and a generic warning that dismissal was possible. The case concerned both disadvantage during the process and the justification for the eventual termination.

Matched passage: The Authority found the employer is to pay Mr Raina two months' salary for lost wages.
TONG v SHEFFIELD STEEL SERVICES LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 460 - employer conduct caused constructive dismissal

Mr Tong's claims against Sheffield Steel arose after workplace difficulties, attempts to place him with another employer and the eventual end of his employment. He alleged both unjustified disadvantage and constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: ) Orders and payments mentioned Lost wages / arrears: $13,324.
KU v EMPLOYMENT FOCUS LIMITED TRADING AS PBRS and Anor [2025] NZERA 455 - redundancy process materially unfair

KU was made redundant by Employment Focus trading as PBRS after a restructure process in which meeting times, consultation steps, alternatives and redeployment were disputed. The ERA examined whether the business had genuinely consulted before moving from proposal to termination.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Lost wages / arrears: $1,057.

Browse topics