ClickCease

Results for unpaid wages

Showing 137-144 of 279 results
WYETH v HANSEN PRODUCTS (NZ) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 92 - unjustified dismissal

This costs determination followed Christopher Wyeth's partly successful employment case against Hansen Products. The dispute was whether costs should be reduced because he had rejected a $10,000 Calderbank settlement offer before the substantive determination.

Matched passage: ) Orders and payments mentioned Costs: $3,500.
STL Linehaul Ltd v Waters [2022] NZEmpC 114 - employer challenge unsuccessful

STL Linehaul challenged an ERA determination that had found Leo Waters' redundancy unjustified and awarded him remedies. The Employment Court proceeding tested whether the employer could overturn that employee-side outcome and the amounts flowing from it.

Matched passage: ... Employment Court outcome: employer challenge unsuccessful Compensation: $17,000 remained payable Costs / filing fee: $9,071.56 remained payable The Authority proceedings Mr Waters had succeeded in the Authority against STL Linehaul. The dispute generated both substantive and ...
Juliet Hull v Sleaktek Limited and Robert Lawrence [2026] NZERA 579 - CEO wins dismissal and disadvantage claims

Sleaktek stopped paying chief executive Juliet Hull, pursued a redundancy process she said was predetermined and later raised serious-misconduct allegations that had not been fairly put to her. The case also concerned director Robert Lawrence's personal involvement.

Matched passage: He was also found involved in employment-standard breaches, allowing recovery from him of qualifying amounts Sleaktek cannot pay.
Fuyu Zhuo v BNS Co Limited and BNS Group Limited [2026] NZERA 45 - unjustified summary dismissal over till cash allegations; employer fidelity claim fails; $15,000 compensation and $3,000 penalty

Fuyu Zhuo was summarily dismissed and trespassed from a hospitality business after allegations that he had taken cash from the till. The employer's case also included a fidelity claim, while Mr Zhuo challenged the lack of a fair investigation and sought wage and holiday entitlements.

Matched passage: Wage arrears: payment for 2 June to 24 June 2024 (amount to be calculated/agreed).
Nan Jia and Huachao Hou v FX NZ Limited and Yingsi Wei [2026] NZERA 30 - unjustified disadvantage and dismissal

Construction workers Nan Jia and Huachao Hou alleged FX NZ made unlawful rent deductions from wages and failed to pay public-holiday, annual-leave and other minimum entitlements. Their case combined employment-standard claims with personal-grievance issues about the employer's treatment of them.

Matched passage: [40] As it relates to deductions from the wages earned by Mr Jia and Mr Hou, there is no information to suggest that the manner of payment for Mr Jia was any different to that used to pay Mr Hao.
HIRST v AL ENTERPRISES LIMITED [2025] NZERA 474 - bakery worker dismissed without fair process

Hailee-Anne Hirst said a bakery effectively dismissed her after calling her in on a day off and confronting her about allegedly missing market takings. The employer denied dismissing her but did not participate in the investigation meeting.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Costs: $6,150.
Shaun Graves v NZSL Employment Limited [2026] NZERA 669 - contractor became an employee before summary dismissal

Shaun Graves initially worked through his own contracting company, but later moved onto NZSL's PAYE payroll, worked regular hours under its direction and used its equipment. The ERA found he had become an employee from 23 September 2024 and was unjustifiably dismissed when simply told his services were no longer required.

Matched passage: PAYE payroll and the real nature of the relationship From around September 2024, at the suggestion of an NZSL director, Mr Graves was placed on NZSL's PAYE payroll and received fortnightly payslips.
KCY v XSH [2026] NZERA 516 - bullying complaint failures, forced transfer and dismissal over promotional gifts

Retail employee KCY complained of bullying linked to her Russian ethnicity, was placed on paid leave without proper consultation and directed to transfer stores immediately. She was later summarily dismissed over expired promotional gifts and disclosure of a back-office code.

Matched passage: Its letter said failure to attend would be treated as unpaid leave.

Browse topics