STL Linehaul Ltd v Waters [2022] NZEmpC 114 - employer challenge unsuccessful
STL Linehaul challenged Authority determinations in which Leo Waters had succeeded. The Employment Court did not overturn the result in the employer's favour. The employee's compensation and the relevant costs award remained payable.
At a glance
- Citation: [2022] NZEmpC 114
- Judge: Judge J C Holden
- Judgment date: 28 June 2022
- Underlying ERA proceedings: Waters v STL Linehaul Ltd, including [2021] NZERA 304
- Employment Court outcome: employer challenge unsuccessful
- Compensation: $17,000 remained payable
- Costs / filing fee: $9,071.56 remained payable
The Authority proceedings
Mr Waters had succeeded in the Authority against STL Linehaul. The dispute generated both substantive and costs issues before moving to the Employment Court.
The Employment Court challenge
STL Linehaul challenged the Authority result. The Court did not disturb the employee's entitlement to the compensation at issue and required the employer to meet the relevant costs and filing-fee liability.
What changed from the ERA
The important point for subsequent-history labelling is that the employee's ERA success was not reversed. A reader of the underlying Authority case does not need a warning that its core outcome was later overturned by [2022] NZEmpC 114.
Why this case matters
Publishing later challenge outcomes is still useful even when the Authority was upheld. It lets readers see that the determination was tested in the Employment Court and survived that challenge.
Primary documents and related material
Read the full Employment Court judgment
If the embedded PDF does not load on your device, use the button below to open it in a new tab.
Mobile / tablet tip: Some browsers do not display embedded PDFs reliably. Use the Open button above.
Source: Employment Court judgment and related public material.
