ClickCease

Results for 90 day trial

Showing 137-144 of 295 results
Recurring problems that come up in ERA cases

Recurring factual and procedural mistakes seen in ERA disputes, including poor records, unclear allegations, rushed dismissals, weak redundancy consultation and failures to prove loss or mitigation.

Matched passage: The best evidence is usually concrete: what changed in day-to-day life, sleep, appetite, relationships, confidence, work functioning, and how long it lasted.
Workplace bullying in New Zealand: what it is and what you can do

What workplace bullying means in New Zealand, the difference between repeated unreasonable behaviour and ordinary conflict or performance management, and the evidence and legal options available to an affected employee.

Matched passage: Personal grievance time limit: most personal grievances must be raised within 90 days of the relevant action.
No Win No Fee Employment Lawyer NZ | Personal Grievance & Dismissal Help

Employee-side no-win-no-fee employment advocacy for suitable personal-grievance, dismissal and redundancy cases, including mediation and ERA representation where the case meets the acceptance criteria.

Matched passage: Wages, holiday pay and contractual claims Some cases involve unpaid wages, holiday pay, notice, deductions, hours of work or contractual entitlements rather than a conventional dismissal grievance.
Shaun Graves v NZSL Employment Limited [2026] NZERA 669 - contractor became an employee before summary dismissal

Shaun Graves initially worked through his own contracting company, but later moved onto NZSL's PAYE payroll, worked regular hours under its direction and used its equipment. The ERA found he had become an employee from 23 September 2024 and was unjustifiably dismissed when simply told his services were no longer required.

Matched passage: He worked regular hours from Monday to Friday, with occasional Saturdays, using NZSL plant and equipment.
Eric Paul Tillocksingh v Driver Employment Limited [2026] NZERA 663 - resign or be dismissed ultimatum was an unjustified dismissal

After a customer complaint, truck driver Eric Tillocksingh was called into meetings without advance written allegations or warning that dismissal was possible. The ERA preferred his evidence that he was told to resign or be dismissed, found the process fundamentally unfair, and awarded $15,000 compensation plus $17,448.75 lost remuneration.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Emily Barr v Brooker Travel Limited [2026] NZERA 651 - bullying complaint failures led to constructive dismissal

Emily Barr complained about repeated belittling and dismissive treatment by her manager. Brooker Travel obtained an external investigation but then failed to adequately protect her, disclose the final report or provide a workable return-to-work plan. The ERA found unjustified disadvantage and constructive dismissal, awarding $20,000 compensation and six months' lost wages with associated entitlements.

Matched passage: 56 holiday pay, employer KiwiSaver contributions and interest.

Browse topics