ClickCease

Results for employee contribution

Showing 65-72 of 196 results
JAGJIT SINGH v L&B FOODS LIMITED and ANOR [2026] NZERA 13 - Unjustified dismissal upheld; $8,933 remedies (reduced) plus wage arrears.

Kitchen hand Jagjit Singh was dismissed immediately after the employer believed he had attended work intoxicated and later returned to the restaurant. There was no paper trail of prior warnings or a proper investigation before the phone-call and email dismissal.

Matched passage: Employee Unfair Dismissal Case Form Read the full ERA determination (embedded) If the embedded PDF does not load on your device, use the button below to open it in a new tab.
Jimmy Nelson v The Digger Man Limited [2025] NZERA 835 - dismissal for unexplained absences held unjustified on process; remedies reduced 50% for contribution; $720 lost wages and $5,000 compensation

Jimmy Nelson was dismissed by The Digger Man after repeated attendance problems and unexplained absences. The employer had genuine concerns, but the issue was whether it gave him a final, fair opportunity to understand the seriousness of the latest incidents and explain himself before termination.

Matched passage: Remedies were reduced for employee contribution.
Costs (ERA and Employment Court)
7 articles

Costs in employment disputes - how the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) awards costs contributions using the daily tariff, when costs are increased or reduced, and how Employment Court costs can differ.

Continue
LJB v EBD [2026] NZERA 78 - resigned employee sent home mid-notice with no process; dismissal unjustified; $16,500 compensation plus $9,000 penalties for withheld wages and missing time records

LJB had already resigned and was working out one month's notice when EBD's HR manager called her to a meeting, told her to clear her desk and sent her away before the notice period expired. No allegations or supporting material had been put to her in advance and she had no genuine opportunity to respond.

Matched passage: The Authority considered contribution under s 124 and declined to reduce remedies.
Robert Tunnicliffe v Solly's Freight (1978) Limited [2026] NZERA 91 - dismissed over limited-licence application; dismissal unjustified

Robert Tunnicliffe could not perform his ordinary driving duties and Solly's Freight placed him on alternative work while a limited-licence issue was being worked through. The relationship deteriorated over who should progress and pay for the licence application, and Solly's dismissed him on 24 April 2024.

Matched passage: Check the PDF for full context (gross/net, tax, contribution, and deadlines).
Election 2026: Labour and Opportunity Asked About the 2026 Employment Law Changes

Ahead of the 2026 election, Labour and Opportunity were asked to state their positions on the recent Employment Relations Act changes, including contribution, remedies and employee access to justice.

Matched passage: Section 123C removes reinstatement and compensation under section 123(1)(c) where qualifying contribution is established.
Askkan Vakilipour Takaloo v Kaur Queens Trading Limited [2026] NZERA 507 - taxi driver was an employee and constructively dismissed

Kaur Queens Trading labelled taxi driver Ashkan Vakilipour Takaloo an independent contractor, but controlled and integrated his work into its taxi business. The relationship broke down amid withheld wages, aggressive verbal abuse and cancellation of his ability to work out his notice.

Matched passage: ... Kaur Queens Trading Limited, trading as Mr Singh Taxis Work: taxi driver Status: employee, despite contractor wording Outcome: unjustified constructive dismissal Total ordered: $21,869.04 Contribution: no reduction Costs: reserved The company did not defend the claim ...
Devon Whitham v Brutalitees Limited and Christine Dawson [2026] NZERA 325 - tattoo and piercing apprentice was an employee, not a contractor

Devon Whitham entered a tattoo and piercing apprenticeship that Brutalitees described as unpaid and contractor-like despite exercising close control over her work. The case concerned her true employment status, unpaid work and the heated meeting at which the relationship ended.

Matched passage: ... personal recovery from a person involved in breaches Employment finding: Ms Whitham was an employee of Brutalitees Limited, not an independent contractor Second respondent finding: Christine Dawson was not found to be Ms Whitham's employer or joint employer Dismissal finding: ...

Browse topics