ClickCease

Results for redundancy

Showing 49-56 of 94 results
Singh v McKee [2026] NZEmpC 146 - Employment Court increased PG compensation from $8,000 to $15,000

The Employment Court left the ERA's unchallenged finding of unjustified redundancy dismissal in place but increased compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings from $8,000 to $15,000. The judgment is useful guidance on evidence of emotional harm and the updated compensation bands.

Matched passage: ... ERA determination: Singh v SJ McKee Ltd [2024] NZERA 179 Underlying dismissal: unjustified redundancy dismissal ERA compensation: $8,000 Employment Court compensation: $15,000 Key issue: quantum and proof of s 123(1)(c)(i) harm Outcome: challenge succeeded on compensation; ...
Juliet Hull v Sleaktek Limited and Robert Lawrence [2026] NZERA 579 - CEO wins dismissal and disadvantage claims

Sleaktek stopped paying chief executive Juliet Hull, pursued a redundancy process she said was predetermined and later raised serious-misconduct allegations that had not been fairly put to her. The case also concerned director Robert Lawrence's personal involvement.

Matched passage: A predetermined redundancy Sleaktek proposed making Ms Hull's position redundant.
Ronald Thomas Shea v STLand Contracting Limited (in liquidation) [2026] NZERA 420 - dismissed by phone without a process

Ronald Shea's hours at STLand Contracting fell sharply before he was told by phone that there was no more work for him. He also alleged bullying and an unsafe workplace, while the employer had undertaken no redundancy or dismissal consultation.

Matched passage: But it did not run any consultation, workplace-change or redundancy process at all.
Employment Law Help for Employers NZ | Staff Disputes, PGs and ERA Claims

Employer-side help for personal grievances, disciplinary problems, redundancy, mediation and ERA claims, with an emphasis on fixing process risks early and preserving evidence before positions harden.

Matched passage: Redundancy and restructuring: reviewing the business case, proposal letters, consultation process, selection criteria, redeployment, and final decision letters.
FVG v YJN [2026] NZERA 242 - suspension and dismissal unjustified; remedies reduced 30% for contribution

FVG, a structural engineer, challenged her suspension, the handling of bullying and performance concerns, and her eventual dismissal by YJN. The case required the ERA to separate several disadvantage allegations from the fairness of the final dismissal process.

Matched passage: For redundancy, genuineness and process are separate: consultation and redeployment assessment remain critical.
Emily Grinsted v Bunnings Limited [2026] NZERA 236 - STI bonus claim succeeds; four other disadvantage claims fail

Emily Grinsted, Bunnings' New Zealand People and Culture Manager, brought five unjustified-disadvantage claims while remaining employed. The complaints concerned how criticisms were raised, information and duties, contractual obligations and a short-term incentive bonus.

Matched passage: For redundancy, genuineness and process are separate: consultation and redeployment assessment remain critical.
Stephanie Martin v SAS Builders Limited [2026] NZERA 226 - genuine restructure but consultation and redeployment failures

SAS Builders made Stephanie Martin redundant during a 2024 restructure. The central issues were whether the commercial restructure was genuine, whether the consultation was fair, and whether she should have been considered for a new role created in the business.

Matched passage: What happened SAS Builders Limited (SAS) commenced a restructure in September 2024, which resulted in the termination of Stephanie Martin's employment.
Jingsheng Liu v Legend International Holdings Limited, Hongyu Holding Limited and Wang Yu [2025] NZERA 702 - unjustified dismissal by 'no work next week' text; 4 weeks lost wages + notice arrears; $15,000 compensation; penalties and s 142Y leave

Cabinet maker Jingsheng Liu was told by text that there would be no work the following week after the business moved and operations shifted between related companies. There had been no consultation, termination process or reasonable notice.

Matched passage: Redundancy still needs process: even where business is slow, consultation and notice are required.

Browse topics