ClickCease

Results for personal grievance

Showing 49-56 of 363 results
Employment Law Advice for Employers
20 articles

Employer employment law help for Personal Grievance responses, disciplinary process, redundancy, MBIE mediation, ERA claims, settlement strategy and Employment Court risk.

Continue
How MBIE employment mediation works

A step-by-step explanation of MBIE employment mediation from referral and preparation through opening positions, caucus negotiations, settlement drafting and what happens if no agreement is reached.

Matched passage: Done properly, it can resolve a Personal Grievance (PG) quickly, confidentially, and on terms you control - without waiting months for an ERA hearing.
Menzies v Corrigan [2025] NZEmpC 186 - employment advocate and employment lawyer conduct

Menzies v Corrigan concerned an ERA compliance order that required a company director personally to take steps to fund a liquidated employer so grievance remedies could be paid. The challenge raised questions about s 137(2), separate corporate personality and the reach of compliance jurisdiction.

Matched passage: Catherine Stewart Barrister Costs - Menzies v Corrigan [2025] NZEmpC 186 Mr Menzies was argued out of the ordinary limited-liability protection of his company in relation to personal grievance remedies owed by Prime Focus Security Limited, which was already in liquidation.
WATSON v ALCHEMY BUILDERS LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 265 - disadvantage claim fails but dismissal grievance succeeds

Mr Watson challenged a written warning and later alleged he was constructively dismissed after his relationship with Alchemy Builders deteriorated and he was removed from a workplace WhatsApp group. Timeliness affected the earlier disadvantage grievance.

Matched passage: After that, On 1 December 2023 Mr Watson's representative sent a personal grievance letter to ABL alleging unjustified disadvantage caused by the written warning ABL had issued him on 22 August 2023.
CALLEN v ALARON PRODUCTS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 165 - dismissal grievance allowed; compensation and lost wages awarded

Mr Callen's unjustified-dismissal grievance against Alaron Products was not formally filed in the Authority until after the ordinary 90-day raising period had become an issue. The case addressed whether the grievance could nevertheless proceed and what remedies followed from the dismissal claim.

Matched passage: After that, Mr Callen lodged an amended application in the Authority on 1 July 2024, seeking that the unjustified dismissal personal grievance be heard out of time.
ZHENG v EASTPAC CORP LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 149 - dismissal grievance raised in time; compensation and wage arrears

Ms Zheng worked for Eastpac and later disputed both the way her employment ended and substantial unpaid wages. A preliminary issue was whether her WeChat communications had raised an unjustified-dismissal grievance clearly enough and within the 90-day period.

Matched passage: Later, The Authority is satisfied that Ms Zheng's WeChat communications on 15 March 2021 was sufficient to raise a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal, even although the resolution she focused on was still the recovery of wage arrears she believed she was owed.

Browse topics