ClickCease

Results for 90 day trial

Showing 49-56 of 255 results
Aiga Faamanu Roache v Landcorp Farming Limited t/a Pamu [2026] NZERA 55 - redundancy restructure held unjustified; $18,000 compensation and $8,900.15 lost wages

Aiga Faamanu Roache's Accounts Payable Team Leader role at Pamu was disestablished after automation reduced manual finance processing. The ERA examined whether Pamu had actually explained why her leadership role was surplus, allowed meaningful consultation and handled redeployment properly.

Matched passage: Remedies and orders The Authority ordered Pamu to pay the employee the following (within 28 days): Compensation for hurt and humiliation: $18,000.
ZHENG v EASTPAC CORP LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 149 - dismissal grievance raised in time; compensation and wage arrears

Ms Zheng worked for Eastpac and later disputed both the way her employment ended and substantial unpaid wages. A preliminary issue was whether her WeChat communications had raised an unjustified-dismissal grievance clearly enough and within the 90-day period.

Matched passage: The determination records that The Authority was satisfied from viewing the evidence objectively that Ms Zheng did raise a grievance of unjustified dismissal within the 90-day time limit that was sufficiently apparent to enable Eastpac to remedy it.
PAYNE and Ors v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES and Anor [2025] NZERA 79 - Preliminary strike-out (settlement/estoppel) issues

A group of MPI employees sought to pursue claims arising from roster and restructure changes despite earlier litigation and a mediated settlement. The preliminary determination addressed whether the claims were barred by the certified settlement, estoppel or the Authority's jurisdiction.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
ADO v JOAN FERNIE CHARITABLE TRUST BOARD [2025] NZERA 3 - redundancy found to be a pretext for conduct concerns

ADO was selected for redundancy by the Joan Fernie Charitable Trust Board after workplace conduct concerns and an argument had arisen. The ERA examined whether redundancy was genuinely driven by commercial considerations and whether redeployment, including a proposed trial in the Stock Manager role, was fairly considered.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 3 Registry: Wellington Parties: ADO v JOAN FERNIE CHARITABLE TRUST BOARD Authority member: Rowan Anderson Hearing date: 20 and 21 August 2024 (2 days) and 20 September and 8 October 2024 (2 days) Outcome: A penalty determination was made.
Nan Jia and Huachao Hou v FX NZ Limited and Yingsi Wei [2026] NZERA 30 - unjustified disadvantage and dismissal

Construction workers Nan Jia and Huachao Hou alleged FX NZ made unlawful rent deductions from wages and failed to pay public-holiday, annual-leave and other minimum entitlements. Their case combined employment-standard claims with personal-grievance issues about the employer's treatment of them.

Matched passage: ... Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies, including compensation and payment of wage/holiday pay entitlements. Story in plain English Nan Jia and Huachao Hou v FX NZ Limited and Yingsi Wei is an Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination from AUCKLAND. The Authority ...
OCO v ZUA [2025] NZERA 790 - Constructive dismissal after unfair suspension and defective disciplinary process

OCO resigned after being suspended and put through a disciplinary process by ZUA. The case centred on whether the suspension and investigation were fair and whether the employer's cumulative conduct was serious enough to make the resignation a constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: nz/assets/elawpdf/2025/2025-NZERA-790.
MON v ALLIED AUTO PARTS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 590 - dismissal by text unjustified; no contribution

Allied Auto Parts dismissed Mr Mon by text message and required him to work out two weeks' notice. The employer later relied on concerns about working from home and other matters, but no proper disciplinary or dismissal process had been carried out.

Matched passage: nz/assets/elawpdf/2025/2025-NZERA-590.
CANALES v THERMASHIELD LIMITED [2025] NZERA 522 - employment existed before first day; dismissal by text unjustified

Mr Canales accepted a part-time window-installer job with Thermashield but missed his intended first day because of a migraine. The case turned on whether an employment relationship had already been formed and whether later text messages brought it to an end.

Matched passage: In summary, Mr Canales says a migraine stopped him from turning up to work on his first day and when he was able to look at his phone, he saw Thermashield had dismissed him by text message.

Browse topics