ClickCease

Results for genuine redundancy

Showing 41-48 of 59 results
Sophie Kennett v Polygon GY Developments Limited [2026] NZERA 405 - engineered resignation, redundancy and Holidays Act entitlements

Sophie Kennett resigned from Polygon GY Developments after a course of conduct she said was designed to force her out, in a context also involving a claimed redundancy and unpaid Holidays Act entitlements. The ERA examined the reality of the resignation rather than only its formal label.

Matched passage: It then terminated her employment by redundancy while the sale of the Bishopdale Subway store was still conditional, without notice, without properly considering redeployment to its other stores, and without supplying relevant restructure information.
Wendy Darrell v Canterbury Vehicle [2026] NZERA 35 - redundancy, unjustified disadvantage and dismissal

Wendy Darrell's dispute with Canterbury Vehicle concerned the ending of her employment and associated employment entitlements. The ERA considered whether the employer's conduct met the justification standard and what compensation or payments were required for the breaches established.

Matched passage: Key themes recorded include: [40] Then in a follow up email at 10:49 am on 26 September 2024 CVC confirmed its dismissal of Ms Darrell by serving a notice of redundancy that terminated her employment with immediate effect and advised that no redundancy payment would be made.
Juliet Hull v Sleaktek Limited and Robert Lawrence [2026] NZERA 579 - CEO wins dismissal and disadvantage claims

Sleaktek stopped paying chief executive Juliet Hull, pursued a redundancy process she said was predetermined and later raised serious-misconduct allegations that had not been fairly put to her. The case also concerned director Robert Lawrence's personal involvement.

Matched passage: Financial difficulty can support a genuine redundancy, but it does not remove consultation obligations.
Ronald Thomas Shea v STLand Contracting Limited (in liquidation) [2026] NZERA 420 - dismissed by phone without a process

Ronald Shea's hours at STLand Contracting fell sharply before he was told by phone that there was no more work for him. He also alleged bullying and an unsafe workplace, while the employer had undertaken no redundancy or dismissal consultation.

Matched passage: STLand Contracting Limited was in serious financial difficulty and had genuine grounds to consider changing Mr Shea's role or hours.
FVG v YJN [2026] NZERA 242 - suspension and dismissal unjustified; remedies reduced 30% for contribution

FVG, a structural engineer, challenged her suspension, the handling of bullying and performance concerns, and her eventual dismissal by YJN. The case required the ERA to separate several disadvantage allegations from the fairness of the final dismissal process.

Matched passage: For redundancy, genuineness and process are separate: consultation and redeployment assessment remain critical.
Emily Grinsted v Bunnings Limited [2026] NZERA 236 - STI bonus claim succeeds; four other disadvantage claims fail

Emily Grinsted, Bunnings' New Zealand People and Culture Manager, brought five unjustified-disadvantage claims while remaining employed. The complaints concerned how criticisms were raised, information and duties, contractual obligations and a short-term incentive bonus.

Matched passage: For redundancy, genuineness and process are separate: consultation and redeployment assessment remain critical.
Jingsheng Liu v Legend International Holdings Limited, Hongyu Holding Limited and Wang Yu [2025] NZERA 702 - unjustified dismissal by 'no work next week' text; 4 weeks lost wages + notice arrears; $15,000 compensation; penalties and s 142Y leave

Cabinet maker Jingsheng Liu was told by text that there would be no work the following week after the business moved and operations shifted between related companies. There had been no consultation, termination process or reasonable notice.

Matched passage: Redundancy still needs process: even where business is slow, consultation and notice are required.
MON v ALLIED AUTO PARTS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 590 - dismissal by text unjustified; no contribution

Allied Auto Parts dismissed Mr Mon by text message and required him to work out two weeks' notice. The employer later relied on concerns about working from home and other matters, but no proper disciplinary or dismissal process had been carried out.

Matched passage: Practical takeaways Redundancy determinations usually turn on genuineness and consultation quality.

Browse topics