ClickCease

Results for redeployment

Showing 33-39 of 39 results
Glenice Cooper v Success Realty [2025] NZERA 782 - redundancy, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

After 21 years as a marketing manager, Glenice Cooper was dismissed for redundancy by Success Realty. By the investigation meeting the employer conceded the dismissal was unjustified, leaving the ERA to determine the proper level of lost remuneration, bonus and compensation.

Matched passage: For redundancy, genuineness and process are separate: consultation and redeployment assessment remain critical.
WILLIAMS v LONGEVITY CONSTRUCTION LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 215 - redundancy substantively and procedurally unjustified

Mr Williams was told by email on 17 March 2024 that he had been made redundant immediately. He had not previously been told his job was in jeopardy, no supporting information accompanied the decision, and there had been no genuine consultation before the outcome was reached.

Matched passage: It was not open to a fair and reasonable employer in Longevity's situation to have concluded that Mr Williams needed to be made redundant without consulting with him about that and/or carefully considering possible redeployment options.
PAYNE and Ors v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES and Anor [2025] NZERA 79 - Preliminary strike-out (settlement/estoppel) issues

A group of MPI employees sought to pursue claims arising from roster and restructure changes despite earlier litigation and a mediated settlement. The preliminary determination addressed whether the claims were barred by the certified settlement, estoppel or the Authority's jurisdiction.

Matched passage: Later, On 27 May 2020 MPI advises staff by letter of changes to shift conditions for some staff and redeployment to other roles while the border is closed.
Leo Waters v S.T.L Linehaul Ltd [2021] NZERA 304 - Unjustified dismissal, redundancy process failures

Leo Waters was made redundant by STL Linehaul in a process he said lacked genuine consultation and a fair opportunity to influence the decision. The ERA examined both the employer's business rationale and whether the redundancy procedure met the good-faith and justification standards.

Matched passage: The key point: even if a redundancy is genuine, an employer can still lose if there is little or no consultation, relevant information is not shared, selection criteria are not discussed, and redeployment is not properly explored.
Employment Law Help for Employers NZ | Staff Disputes, PGs and ERA Claims

Employer-side help for personal grievances, disciplinary problems, redundancy, mediation and ERA claims, with an emphasis on fixing process risks early and preserving evidence before positions harden.

Matched passage: Redundancy and restructuring: reviewing the business case, proposal letters, consultation process, selection criteria, redeployment, and final decision letters.
Dismissal and Disciplinary Process for Employers NZ | Misconduct and Warnings

A practical employer guide to misconduct, warnings and dismissal: allegation letters, meetings, decision-making, proportionality and the procedural requirements in s 103A.

Matched passage: The Court accepted the employer had legitimate concerns about exemption material, asked for further information, and considered alternatives including redeployment.
Employment Law Advice for Employers
20 articles

Employer employment law help for Personal Grievance responses, disciplinary process, redundancy, MBIE mediation, ERA claims, settlement strategy and Employment Court risk.

Continue

Browse topics