ClickCease

Results for workplace investigation

Showing 265-272 of 290 results
Tihei Kereopa-Rerekura v Cruz Bar Ltd [2023] NZERA 376 - Unjustified dismissal during Covid isolation, redundancy not genuine

Tihei Kereopa-Rerekura's employment at Cruz Bar ended while Covid isolation requirements were affecting work. The employer relied on redundancy, but the ERA examined whether there was a genuine redundancy and whether any fair consultation process occurred before the employment ended.

Matched passage: ... v Cruz Bar Limited [2023] NZERA 376 ERA registry: Christchurch Member: Antoinette Baker Investigation meeting: 9 March 2023 (Christchurch) Determination date: 17 July 2023 Representatives: Lawrence Anderson (advocate) for the applicant; Mr Williamson for the respondent ...
Brad Capper v CJS Construction [2023] NZERA 314 - unjustified dismissal; 50% contribution; no lost wages

Brad Capper's short employment with CJS Construction ended in a dismissal that the employer did not attempt to justify under a 90-day trial clause. The case turned on dismissal fairness, his own contribution and whether he had proved efforts to mitigate lost wages.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2023] NZERA 314 Registry: Auckland Authority member: Alastair Dumbleton Investigation meeting: 14 March 2023 Determination: 16 June 2023 Outcome: Unjustified dismissal; remedies reduced 50% for contribution.
Mere Broughton v The Whanau Ora Community Clinic Ltd [2023] NZERA 52 - Unjustified dismissal, probation clause misused

Mere Broughton was dismissed after 106 days at The Whanau Ora Community Clinic. Her agreement contained a probation clause, and the dispute centred on the employer's attempt to use that clause as a shortcut to termination rather than carrying out a substantively justified and fair process.

Matched passage: The Authority records at paragraph [5] that George Ngatai , described in the determination as the respondent's director, attended the investigation meeting with manager Raewyn Bhana.
Kaytlin Pinder v S & O Bayliss Ltd [2022] NZERA 646 - 90-day trial invalid before start, unjustified dismissal, penalties

Kaytlin Pinder was dismissed under a purported 90-day trial period. The key issue was whether the trial provision had been validly agreed before she became an employee, together with related failures to provide proper employment documentation.

Matched passage: ... Citation: Kaytlin Pinder v S & O Bayliss Limited [2022] NZERA 646 Member: Leon Robinson Investigation meeting: 7 June 2022 (Tokoroa) Determination date: 9 December 2022 Representatives: Lawrence Anderson for the applicant; Tom Jarman for the respondent Direct link to the ...
Gary Cotton v Darcee Gosling, Gosling Solutions Limited, and Rob Ralston [2022] NZERA 90 - employer identity dispute; sole trader held liable; summary dismissal unjustified; $19, - orders for lost wages, arrears, holiday pay, and compensation

Gary Cotton's case required the ERA to identify who his employer actually was after work performed through Gosling Solutions and dealings involving Darcee Gosling and Rob Ralston. The case also concerned a summary termination and claims for unpaid employment entitlements.

Matched passage: ... At a glance Citation: [2022] NZERA 90 Registry: Christchurch Authority member: David G Beck Investigation meeting: 25 February 2022 (video link) Submissions received: 2 March 2022 (Applicant) and 14 March 2022 (First Respondent) Determination date: 16 March 2022 Main issues: ...
Leo Waters v S.T.L Linehaul Ltd [2021] NZERA 304 - Unjustified dismissal, redundancy process failures

Leo Waters was made redundant by STL Linehaul in a process he said lacked genuine consultation and a fair opportunity to influence the decision. The ERA examined both the employer's business rationale and whether the redundancy procedure met the good-faith and justification standards.

Matched passage: ... NZERA 304 ERA location: Auckland Member: Nicola Craig Determination date: 19 July 2021 Investigation meeting dates: 15 March 2021 and 19 April 2021 Role: Administration assistant Employment start: Late August 2019 Dismissal basis claimed by employer: Redundancy Applicant ...
Neil Armstrong v Surplus Brokers Ltd [2019] NZERA 235 - Casual employment dismissal, penalties for no agreement

Neil Armstrong worked for Surplus Brokers in an arrangement the employer characterised as casual. The dispute concerned whether he had actually been dismissed, whether the casual label affected his rights, and the employer's failures to provide compliant employment documentation.

Matched passage: ... v Surplus Brokers Limited [2019] NZERA 235 ERA registry: Auckland Member: Robin Arthur Investigation meeting: 22 January 2019 Determination date: 18 April 2019 Work period: November 2017 to April 2018 (seven events / shows) Applicant representative: Lawrence Anderson ...

Browse topics