ClickCease

Results for unpaid wages

Showing 257-264 of 360 results
JIANG v TRUSTED TOUCH THERAPY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) and ORS [2025] NZERA 385 - unjustified dismissal and employment-standard breaches

Ms Jiang worked for Trusted Touch Therapy under disputed casual-employment paperwork and later raised dismissal and minimum-employment-standard claims. The company entered liquidation after the investigation meeting, and the ERA also considered inaccurate wage and time records.

Matched passage: 00 in cash per week until early November when TTTL started to pay wages by direct credit.
MURRAY v OWAKA MOTORS (2008) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 207 - driver-licence dismissal unjustified after inadequate investigation

Owaka Motors dismissed Mr Murray after he lost the driver licence required for his work. He also alleged mental-health discrimination and failure to provide an employment agreement, while the ERA examined whether the employer adequately investigated alternatives and heard from him before dismissal.

Matched passage: Mr Murray has sought compensation of $25,000 for his unjustified dismissal and wages lost because of his grievance.
Cameron Rix v Rotorua Quarry Limited [2025] NZERA 152 - The Authority found the employee was unjustifiably dismissed (abandonment was not made out) and awarded remedies.

Rotorua Quarry treated Cameron Rix's absence as abandonment and ended his employment. The ERA had to decide whether his conduct showed an intention to permanently walk away from the job and whether the employer was entitled to terminate on that basis.

Matched passage: The Court noted:2 Previous cases have held that the liability to pay wages, or compensation for wages, rests with the employer and that the payment of, for example, social security payments or accident compensation does not displace this liability.
THING v SOUTH POLE IP HOLDING (NZ) LIMITED [2025] NZERA 142 - dismissal theory fails in part but disadvantage grievance succeeds

Ms Thing's dispute with South Pole IP Holding concerned whether the end of her employment was a dismissal or resignation and whether the employer's earlier conduct had unjustifiably disadvantaged her. The case required the ERA to distinguish direct or constructive dismissal from separate disadvantage grievances.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $15, 000 Lost wages: $8,000 8 weeks' lost wages Holiday pay: $23.
HILL v TAMAKI LABOUR HIRE LIMITED [2025] NZERA 100 - personal grievance partly successful; remedies limited to proven breaches

Mr Hill challenged the ending of his employment with Tamaki Labour Hire and associated treatment during the employment relationship. The case required the ERA to separate the parts of his grievance that were established from claims for which the evidence did not justify relief.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $23,000 Lost wages: One weeks' pay Costs: Costs reserved.
CHUNG v HUYNH [2025] NZERA 69 - trial-period defence fails; dismissal unjustified

Ms Chung was dismissed by email late on Boxing Day after about 100 days of work, with the employer purporting to rely on a 90-day trial period. General performance criticisms were raised later but had not formed a fair dismissal process at the time.

Matched passage: The Authority found that the failure to pay wages in full and when due was unjustified and disadvantaged Ms Chung in the terms and conditions of her employment.
DUNG PHAM v HUYNH [2025] NZERA 75 - dismissal proved; lost remuneration and compensation awarded

Ms Dung Pham disputed the way her employment at a nail salon ended and sought remedies for dismissal. The Authority had to resolve conflicting accounts of whether and when the employer brought the employment relationship to an end.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $20,000 Lost wages / arrears: $14,236.
WEI v LIU and Anor [2025] NZERA 80 - dismissal and wage claims upheld; $15,000 compensation

Mr Wei's claims followed a workplace altercation and the employer's response to it, including the eventual end of his employment and disputed wage-related entitlements. CCTV footage and conflicting accounts of the incident were central to the ERA investigation.

Matched passage: ) Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $3,000.

Browse topics