ClickCease

Results for unjustified dismissal

Showing 257-264 of 325 results
CHAUHAN and Anor v SD & SD INVESTMENTS LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 309 - dismissal and wage claims upheld on roster evidence

The Chauhans worked in a business operated by SD & SD Investments, with disputes about hours worked, who knew about that work, and how Mr Chauhan's relationship with the business ended. The ERA preferred documentary roster and time-record evidence on key factual issues.

Matched passage: ... 2025 and by audio- visual link Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Story in plain English The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. In summary, The investigation meeting commenced in ...
WEI v LIU and Anor [2025] NZERA 80 - dismissal and wage claims upheld; $15,000 compensation

Mr Wei's claims followed a workplace altercation and the employer's response to it, including the eventual end of his employment and disputed wage-related entitlements. CCTV footage and conflicting accounts of the incident were central to the ERA investigation.

Matched passage: ... meeting: 5 February 2025 (Auckland) Determination date: 14 February 2025 Outcome: Unjustified dismissal issues addressed; remedies and any costs/interest determined in the decision. Story in plain English This decision deals with an unjustified dismissal claim and the ...
Neil Armstrong v Surplus Brokers Ltd [2019] NZERA 235 - Casual employment dismissal, penalties for no agreement

Neil Armstrong worked for Surplus Brokers in an arrangement the employer characterised as casual. The dispute concerned whether he had actually been dismissed, whether the casual label affected his rights, and the employer's failures to provide compliant employment documentation.

Matched passage: Unjustified dismissal: the Authority concluded the employer unjustifiably dismissed Mr Armstrong during a period of casual employment.
Faitala and Vea v Pacific Island Business Development Trust [2026] NZEmpC 53 - disadvantage findings and remedies varied

Mr Faitala and Mrs Vea were made redundant by Pacific Island Business Development Trust during a flawed restructure. Their Employment Court challenge focused on pre-dismissal disadvantage during the process and the proper level of lost-remuneration and compensation remedies.

Matched passage: Why this case matters The decision is useful on the distinction between an unjustified disadvantage occurring during employment and a later unjustified dismissal.
Emily Grinsted v Bunnings Limited [2026] NZERA 236 - STI bonus claim succeeds; four other disadvantage claims fail

Emily Grinsted, Bunnings' New Zealand People and Culture Manager, brought five unjustified-disadvantage claims while remaining employed. The complaints concerned how criticisms were raised, information and duties, contractual obligations and a short-term incentive bonus.

Matched passage: Unjustified disadvantage requires unjustified employer conduct and an actual disadvantage.
South Pole IP Holding (NZ) Limited v Hao [2026] NZEmpC 193 - constructive dismissal upheld

South Pole maintained that Xinhua Hao had agreed to resign, pressured him to leave, stopped providing meaningful work and refused to engage with him about work matters. The Employment Court upheld the ERA's constructive-dismissal finding.

Matched passage: The Employment Court upheld the finding that the employer's conduct caused an unjustified constructive dismissal.
Todd Dormer v Rhino-Rack New Zealand Limited [2026] NZERA 353 - ambiguous commission clause, Sales Commission Scheme, and unjustified disadvantage

Rhino-Rack recorded Todd Dormer's commission entitlement only as '10% paid quarterly'. He argued this meant 10 percent of sales or gross margin, while the company said a broader Sales Commission Scheme with individual, regional and company targets applied.

Matched passage: Important distinction: this was not a dismissal case.

Browse topics