ClickCease

CHAUHAN and Anor v SD & SD INVESTMENTS LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 309 - The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.

The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. The investigation meeting commenced in Hamilton on 19 February 2025 to hear the remainder of the evidence.


CHAUHAN and Anor v SD & SD INVESTMENTS LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 309

This page summarises and embeds an Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination. It is not legal advice.

At a glance

  • Citation: [2025] NZERA 309
  • Registry: Auckland
  • Parties: CHAUHAN and Anor v SD & SD INVESTMENTS LIMITED and Ors
  • Authority member: Nicola Craig
  • Hearing date: 19 and 20 February 2025 and by audio- visual link
  • Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.

Story in plain English

The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.

In summary, The investigation meeting commenced in Hamilton on 19 February 2025 to hear the remainder of the evidence. After that, After the 20 February 2025 investigation meeting written submissions were received for the Chauhans and from the Kollurus. Later, At the 19 February 2025 investigation meeting Mr Chauhan gave evidence that he expected to be paid for hours above 40. The determination records that Difficulties with the Kollurus' arguments that they were unaware of Ms Chauhan's work were identified in the preliminary determination.6 [48] The Authority found Ms Chauhan's evidence regarding her hours credible and supported by the roster and time record documentation. The Authority notes that The email refers to attaching minutes and forms for share transfers and Mr Chauhan's director resignation. Ultimately, The Authority concluded that Mr Chauhan was dismissed, being sent away from the business. In the end, An email was later provided to the Authority from B stating that on 20 April 2021 Mr Chauhan sold his car to B as a settlement of outstanding debts owed to him ($8,000 to him and $5,000 to A).

Key case markers

  • This determination comes from the Auckland registry.
  • The parties are CHAUHAN and Anor (employee) and SD & SD INVESTMENTS LIMITED and Ors (employer).
  • Hearing date noted: 19 and 20 February 2025 and by audio- visual link.
  • Authority member: Nicola Craig.

Key events described

  • The investigation meeting commenced in Hamilton on 19 February 2025 to hear the remainder of the evidence.
  • After the 20 February 2025 investigation meeting written submissions were received for the Chauhans and from the Kollurus.
  • At the 19 February 2025 investigation meeting Mr Chauhan gave evidence that he expected to be paid for hours above 40.
  • Difficulties with the Kollurus' arguments that they were unaware of Ms Chauhan's work were identified in the preliminary determination.6 [48] The Authority found Ms Chauhan's evidence regarding her hours credible and supported by the roster and time record documentation.
  • The email refers to attaching minutes and forms for share transfers and Mr Chauhan's director resignation.
  • The Authority concluded that Mr Chauhan was dismissed, being sent away from the business.
  • An email was later provided to the Authority from B stating that on 20 April 2021 Mr Chauhan sold his car to B as a settlement of outstanding debts owed to him ($8,000 to him and $5,000 to A).
  • Examples include getting him to sign director/shareholder meeting notes and resignation as director, along with transfer of shares.

Decision markers

  • Difficulties with the Kollurus' arguments that they were unaware of Ms Chauhan's work were identified in the preliminary determination.6 [48] The Authority found Ms Chauhan's evidence regarding her hours credible and supported by the roster and time record documentation.
  • The Authority concluded that Mr Chauhan was dismissed, being sent away from the business.

Orders and payments mentioned

  • Compensation: $10,000, $1,000.00
  • Costs: Costs awarded.

Note: figures above are extracted from the orders section (or the final orders wording). Check the PDF for full context and any gross/net directions.

Practical takeaways

  • Dismissal justification is assessed through s 103A: what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances.
If you have an active employment problem and deadlines, get advice early. If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.

Read the full ERA determination (embedded)

If the embedded PDF does not load on your device, use the button below to open it in a new tab.

Mobile / tablet tip: Some browsers do not display embedded PDFs reliably. Use the "Open" button above.


Source: Employment Relations Authority determination hosted on determinations.era.govt.nz.

0800 WIN KIWI

Search
Search articles and guides.
Tip: press / to search

Related articles

Browse all articles
Based on: Unfair Dismissal Cases
Philip Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 481 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Philip Powell was employed by OH and N Contracting Limited as a site foreman in a logging operation. The ERA accepted there was some genuine business basis for redundancy because the logging work was nearing completion, the company had not secured other work, and the need for workers was reducing. But the dismissal was still unjustified because OH and N did not follow any real good-faith consultation process before ending Mr Powell's employment. The employer also wrongly used annual holiday pay instead of paying notice wages, failed to provide wage and time records when requested, and was ordered to pay compensation, lost wages, unpaid wages, penalties, and to allow limited personal recovery against the director if the company could not pay...

Conner Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 480 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Conner Powell was employed by OH and N Contracting Limited as a forestry worker from November 2022 until his employment ended on redundancy grounds in January 2025. The ERA accepted there was some genuine business basis for redundancy because the logging work was nearing completion, the company had not secured other work, and the need for workers was reducing. But the dismissal was still unjustified because OH and N did not follow a good-faith restructuring process before ending Mr Powell's employment. The employer also wrongly used annual holiday pay instead of notice wages, failed to provide the employment agreement and wage and time records when requested, and was ordered to pay compensation, lost wages, unpaid wages and penalties...

Jia Jia v TBS Trading Limited and Helen Han [2026] NZERA 478 - no employment agreement, late wages and radio-silent dismissal

Jia Jia worked for TBS Trading Limited as a retail sales assistant for about two and a half months. She was not given a written employment agreement, her wages were not always paid on time, and her employment ended after the employer stopped offering her full-time work and then stopped offering her work at all. The ERA found unjustified dismissal and unjustified disadvantage. It ordered two months' lost wages, $12,500 compensation, penalties for failing to provide an employment agreement and late wage payment, costs and the filing fee. Helen Han was not found personally liable for dismissal remedies, but the ERA granted leave for Ms Jia to recover the penalties from Ms Han personally if TBS could not pay them...

OAS v JIK Limited [2026] NZERA 474 - employee dismissed after seeking family violence leave

OAS was employed as a chef by JIK Limited. After a family violence incident involving his ex-partner, OAS told the employer he needed time away from work to keep his children safe, deal with urgent family matters, meet a victim support adviser and pursue protection-order steps. JIK treated his messages as a resignation or abandonment of employment and left him off the next roster. The ERA held that OAS had not resigned or abandoned his job. He was entitled to family violence leave and JIK's decision not to roster him again was a dismissal. The dismissal was unjustified because JIK failed to engage with the family violence situation and dismissed him for missing work when he was entitled to be away. The Authority awarded compensation and lost wages, reduced by 10 percent for contribution...

Duane April v Coatrite Fire Limited [2026] NZERA 466 - visa worker underpaid, racialised comments, unlawful deductions and unjustified dismissal

Duane April came to New Zealand on an accredited employer work visa to work for Coatrite Fire Limited as an industrial/intumescent spray painter. The ERA found he had been unjustifiably disadvantaged by underpayment at $35 rather than the agreed $38 per hour, unauthorised wage deductions, racialised comments, and an unjustified verbal warning. His later dismissal was also unjustified. The employer failed to provide sufficient information about the allegations, unfairly denied remote support from Mr April's father, relied on matters not properly investigated, and dismissed him after a meeting that had ended with an apparent understanding the employment relationship would continue. Coatrite was ordered to pay compensation, lost wages, arrears, interest and a $4,000 penalty, while most of its claimed set-off against Mr April was rejected...

Qi Sun v Keene Construction Limited [2026] NZERA 465 - builder dismissed by text after querying apprenticeship costs

Qi Sun was employed by Keene Construction Limited as an apprentice builder. After he queried an unpaid $300 apprenticeship-cost payment, the company director texted that there was not going to be a company anymore and told him not to bother coming into work. The ERA found it was reasonable for Mr Sun to understand that he had been dismissed. Keene Construction provided no evidence, filed no reply, did not attend the investigation meeting, and did not justify the dismissal. The Authority awarded lost wages, compensation, wage and holiday pay arrears, and costs...

Browse topics