ClickCease

Results for unfair dismissal

Showing 241-248 of 266 results
Fatima Fahmy v Minimarc Childcare Centre Inc [2026] NZERA 585 - performance dismissal lacked objective assessment

Minimarc Childcare dismissed ECE teacher Fatima Fahmy for performance after its centre manager remained the principal evaluator despite known relationship and bullying complaints. The ERA found the assessment was not sufficiently objective and ordered reinstatement, lost wages and $25,000 compensation.

Matched passage: ... Centre Incorporated, trading as Marc Early Learning Centre Role: registered ECE teacher Dismissal: 3 July 2025 Determination: 24 August 2026 Outcome: unjustified dismissal Reinstatement: ordered Lost wages: from dismissal to 30 April 2026, less casual earnings Compensation: ...
Raheel Reddy v Studio Image Limited [2026] NZERA 323 - barber dismissed by text message after lateness and attendance issues

Barber Raheel Reddy was dismissed by text after ongoing lateness and attendance concerns. Studio Image argued he had resigned or that termination was justified, but there had been no proper disciplinary process giving him a fair opportunity to answer the concerns.

Matched passage: Employee Unfair Dismissal Case Form Read the full ERA determination (embedded) If the embedded PDF does not load on your device, use the button below to open it in a new tab.
Natalie Butler-Smith v David and Dale Cavey t/a DG and DV Cavey Partnership [2026] NZERA 324 - farm assistant dismissed before returning from parental leave

Part-time farm assistant Natalie Butler-Smith was dismissed in February 2024 around the end of parental leave, with the employers raising health-and-safety concerns and disputing aspects of work performed during leave. The respondents did not appear at the investigation meeting.

Matched passage: Compensation can be significant: dismissing a vulnerable employee in a blunt and unfair way can support a substantial injury to feelings award.
Neil Armstrong v Surplus Brokers Ltd [2019] NZERA 235 - Casual employment dismissal, penalties for no agreement

Neil Armstrong worked for Surplus Brokers in an arrangement the employer characterised as casual. The dispute concerned whether he had actually been dismissed, whether the casual label affected his rights, and the employer's failures to provide compliant employment documentation.

Matched passage: Mr Armstrong treated that as a dismissal and raised a personal grievance.
FHE v Auckland Transport [2026] NZERA 552 - justified dismissal but unjustified initial suspension

Auckland Transport investigated FHE over serious conduct involving a former employee with whom he had been in a relationship. Before completing a fair consultation process over suspension, AT had already effectively removed him from work for two days.

Matched passage: But those shortcomings did not ultimately cause unfair treatment in the dismissal decision.
Carol Chesmar v Rooney Earthmoving Limited [2026] NZERA 502 - redundancy consultation was more apparent than real

After more than nine years with Rooney Earthmoving, Carol Chesmar was selected for redundancy amid genuine work and financial pressure. The employer withheld information later relied on to justify the decision, did not consult about removing her from a major project and had effectively decided her role would go before consultation began.

Matched passage: ... operator Length of service: more than nine years Issue: justification for redundancy dismissal Outcome: unjustified dismissal established Lost remuneration: $14,471.60 gross Compensation: $25,000 Contribution: no reduction Total ordered: $39,471.60 Costs: reserved ...
Valerie Leech v Electrical Importing Co Limited [2026] NZERA 553 - employment was agreed before the 90-day trial was signed

Electrical Importing Co agreed Valerie Leech's core job terms and told her when to start before presenting a written employment agreement containing a 90-day trial clause. It later relied on that clause to dismiss her.

Matched passage: ... 18 October 2024 Determination date: 13 August 2026 Outcome: invalid trial period and unjustified dismissal Lost remuneration: $21,250 gross Compensation: $13,000 Total ordered: $34,250 Costs: reserved The job was offered before the agreement arrived Ms Leech interviewed ...
Paul Adams v EverEdge Global Limited [2026] NZERA 509 - employer stopped paying founder to force resignation

EverEdge stopped paying founder and CEO Paul Adams while he continued working from Amsterdam, ignored repeated requests for his salary and later gave inconsistent explanations for the non-payment. Mr Adams ultimately resigned.

Matched passage: A deliberate attempt to coerce resignation The Authority also upheld the alternative constructive-dismissal basis: a deliberate course of conduct intended to force Mr Adams out.

Browse topics