ClickCease

Results for unfair dismissal

Showing 241-248 of 321 results
Juliet Hull v Sleaktek Limited and Robert Lawrence [2026] NZERA 579 - CEO wins dismissal and disadvantage claims

Sleaktek stopped paying chief executive Juliet Hull, pursued a redundancy process she said was predetermined and later raised serious-misconduct allegations that had not been fairly put to her. The case also concerned director Robert Lawrence's personal involvement.

Matched passage: The Employment Relations Authority upheld her unjustified dismissal and disadvantage claims and made substantial monetary orders.
Yucen Xi v Silvertime Trading Limited [2026] NZERA 580 - resign or be fired ultimatum was unjustified dismissal

Silvertime's store manager summoned Yucen Xi to an evening meeting without explaining its purpose, told her to resign or be fired, demanded her key and called security before any allegations had been fairly raised with her.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Yucen Xi v Silvertime Trading Limited [2026] NZERA 580 A store manager summoned Yucen Xi to an evening meeting without explaining its purpose, then gave her a choice between resigning and being fired.
Eun Joo Kim v Sage & Umber Limited and Pei Su [2026] NZERA 555 - public attack caused constructive dismissal

Café owner Pei Su loudly questioned chef Eun Joo Kim's competence and honesty in front of staff and told her she could go if she could not do the job. Ms Kim left immediately after the confrontation.

Matched passage: Constructive dismissal established The Authority treated the matter as constructive dismissal rather than deciding whether the statement that Ms Kim could go was itself a direct dismissal.
Jonathan Rhodes v Barfoot & Thompson Limited [2026] NZERA 543 - medical incapacity dismissal before a genuine opportunity to recover

Barfoot & Thompson dismissed senior property manager Jonathan Rhodes for medical incapacity while he was recovering from concussion and further head injuries. An imminent neurological assessment had not been obtained and the proposed alternative role did not fit clinical advice for a graduated return on reduced hours.

Matched passage: $30,000 compensation and no contribution Mr Rhodes gave compelling evidence about the dismissal's impact.
Briar Kennedy v Adulto HR Limited [2026] NZERA 537 - missing trial clause and predetermined performance dismissal

Adulto HR believed Briar Kennedy was on a 90-day trial, but the agreement given after she started contained no trial clause. The employer then purported to extend the nonexistent trial into probation and dismissed her after 97 days on qualification and performance grounds.

Matched passage: ... date: 7 August 2026 Role: bartender, intended to progress to duty manager Outcome: unjustified dismissal established Lost remuneration: $14,900 gross Compensation: $16,000 Contribution: no reduction Total ordered: $30,900 Costs: reserved Employment and intended ...
KCY v XSH [2026] NZERA 516 - bullying complaint failures, forced transfer and dismissal over promotional gifts

Retail employee KCY complained of bullying linked to her Russian ethnicity, was placed on paid leave without proper consultation and directed to transfer stores immediately. She was later summarily dismissed over expired promotional gifts and disclosure of a back-office code.

Matched passage: The Employment Relations Authority found three unjustified disadvantages and an unjustified dismissal.
George King v Off the Wall Construction Ltd [2026] NZERA 14 - 90-day trial invalid, unjustified dismissal

George King was dismissed by Off the Wall Construction under a purported 90-day trial. The decisive issue was timing: he had already performed paid work before signing the agreement containing the trial provision.

Matched passage: Mr King raised a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal and sought lost wages, compensation for hurt and humiliation, and the cost of tools.
Hurikawa v Walton Mountain Ltd [2026] NZERA 8 - Unjustified dismissal and remedies

Hurikawa was abruptly told he was 'finished' by Walton Mountain without a stated reason, warning or opportunity to respond. The ERA therefore had to assess a direct verbal termination against the minimum substantive and procedural requirements in s 103A.

Matched passage: If you are dealing with an unjustified dismissal claim or need representation at mediation / the ERA, we can assist with strategy, drafting, and settlement.

Browse topics