ClickCease

Results for personal grievance

Showing 241-248 of 363 results
Aiga Faamanu Roache v Landcorp Farming Limited t/a Pamu [2026] NZERA 55 - redundancy restructure held unjustified; $18,000 compensation and $8,900.15 lost wages

Aiga Faamanu Roache's Accounts Payable Team Leader role at Pamu was disestablished after automation reduced manual finance processing. The ERA examined whether Pamu had actually explained why her leadership role was surplus, allowed meaningful consultation and handled redeployment properly.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Andrea Lawson v Luxottica Retail New Zealand Limited [2026] NZERA 52 - investigation process disadvantages upheld; $15,000 compensation and $3,000 good faith penalty

Store manager Andrea Lawson challenged Luxottica's investigation and employment treatment after concerns were raised about store performance and policy compliance. Her case included disadvantage claims, dismissal allegations and an argument that the employer had failed to accommodate a medical condition.

Matched passage: Not every grievance about 'stress' becomes a dismissal case.
CAMERON ROWETH v MT OUTDOORS LIMITED [2026] NZERA 50 - redundancy dismissal held unjustified due to no consultation on selection; $15,000 compensation, $5,400 lost remuneration, $1,800 notice

Mt Outdoors terminated seasonal retail worker Cameron Roweth's fixed-term role early when winter trading was weaker than expected. The business had a genuine need to reduce labour costs, but selected him for redundancy without consulting him about the selection decision.

Matched passage: (see [5], [16], [18]) The employee raised a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal on 8 August 2024.
Mark Beveridge v PVB Investments Limited: 'Bugger off' at the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn was an unjustified dismissal (2026 NZERA 51)

Cook Mark Beveridge was told to 'bugger off' and leave the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn during a confrontation connected with police concerns about marijuana plants on the owner's property. The employer disputed whether those words had actually ended the employment.

Matched passage: Unjustified dismissal and other claims The ERA held that Mr Beveridge established a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.
Fuyu Zhuo v BNS Co Limited and BNS Group Limited [2026] NZERA 45 - unjustified summary dismissal over till cash allegations; employer fidelity claim fails; $15,000 compensation and $3,000 penalty

Fuyu Zhuo was summarily dismissed and trespassed from a hospitality business after allegations that he had taken cash from the till. The employer's case also included a fidelity claim, while Mr Zhuo challenged the lack of a fair investigation and sought wage and holiday entitlements.

Matched passage: Deadlines for a Personal Grievance (PG) can be critical.
Julie Curtis v Affordable UK Caravans and Parts Limited [2026] NZERA 46 - constructive dismissal after employer refused wages and delayed return; $25,000 compensation

Julie Curtis had a regular 20-hour week with Affordable UK Caravans when the employer told her there was no work until mid-January and refused to pay her contracted hours. She treated the prolonged exclusion from paid work as a serious breach and resigned.

Matched passage: No contribution reduction: allegations about later conflict at the workplace did not contribute to the situation giving rise to the grievance, so remedies were not reduced.
MAIORENKO v NEXT GENERATION HOMES LIMITED [2026] NZERA 28 - Unjustified dismissal upheld; $12,000 compensation; $7,000 lost wages; wage arrears ordered.

Next Generation Homes stopped providing Mr Maiorenko with work and ceased communicating with him after he queried pay and future work. The case concerned whether that conduct itself ended the employment relationship and what wage arrears remained outstanding.

Matched passage: Personal grievance type: unjustified dismissal.
Sinclair-Walker v Alert Monitoring Otago (1994) Limited [2026] NZERA 29 - unjustified dismissal; $25,000 compensation and $16,900 lost remuneration

Alert Monitoring dismissed Carl Sinclair-Walker for alleged serious misconduct after raising three concerns about his work performance. The ERA examined whether those concerns and the process used could justify immediate termination.

Matched passage: Decision markers (as described by the Authority) The Authority found Mr Sinclair-Walker established a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.

Browse topics