ClickCease

Results for workplace investigation

Showing 233-240 of 290 results
BALI v R1i TECHNOLOGY LIMITED [2025] NZERA 409 - Webex dismissal without fair process

R1i Technology dismissed Mr Bali during a Webex meeting and then confirmed the decision in writing. The employer did not participate in the ERA proceeding and the evidence showed no meaningful process satisfying the minimum statutory tests of procedural fairness.

Matched passage: ... (including the direction to attend mediation), together with a copy of the notice of investigation, as well as a further copy of the statement of problem were delivered by courier to R1i's registered address for service on 10 March 2025. The determination records that ...
STEWART v OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LIMITED (3265479), OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LIMITED v STEWART (3275619) [2025] NZERA 330 - summary dismissal unjustified; 100% contribution removes lost wages

Open Country Dairy summarily dismissed Mr Stewart on the final day covered by his medical certificate after a disciplinary process. The ERA considered both the employer's process and Mr Stewart's own conduct when assessing justification and remedies.

Matched passage: The Authority notes that Several minutes later they returned and confirmed that Mr Stewart would be suspended pending further investigations into their concerns.
Olliver & Taylor v Te Araroa [2025] NZERA 312 - fixed-term dismissals unjustified; $37,500 and $27,500 compensation

Community Connectors Daynah Olliver and Sheena Taylor were employed on fixed-term agreements that did not properly record the statutory reasons for the fixed terms. Te Araroa then tried to end both employments early without a fair process.

Matched passage: Serious allegations concerning handling of funds had also been raised publicly without first being properly investigated or put to the applicants.
CHAUHAN and Anor v SD & SD INVESTMENTS LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 309 - dismissal and wage claims upheld on roster evidence

The Chauhans worked in a business operated by SD & SD Investments, with disputes about hours worked, who knew about that work, and how Mr Chauhan's relationship with the business ended. The ERA preferred documentary roster and time-record evidence on key factual issues.

Matched passage: In summary, The investigation meeting commenced in Hamilton on 19 February 2025 to hear the remainder of the evidence.
Lekeisha Ramsay v National Storage Ltd [2025] NZERA 269 - Probationary period dismissal held unjustified; $9,000 compensation + $14,040.40 lost wages; penalties dismissed

Lekeisha Ramsay was dismissed by National Storage just over three months into employment under a probationary arrangement. The ERA examined attendance and performance concerns, the adequacy of warnings and whether the employer had given her a fair opportunity to improve and respond before termination.

Matched passage: ... Storage Ltd @citation Authority file: 3267699 Location: Auckland Member: Antoinette Baker Investigation meeting: 3 October 2024 (Auckland) and 8 November 2024 (AVL) Determination date: 14 May 2025 Representation: Lawrence Anderson for Ms Ramsay; John Rooney for the ...
KALKAT v EASY RECRUITMENT LIMITED T/A EASY RECRUIT [2025] NZERA 257 - dismissal grievance partly succeeds; $9,000 compensation

Mr Kalkat was placed in work through Easy Recruitment and later told the placement employer considered his performance inadequate. He alleged that his employment had been ended without a fair process and sought compensation and lost wages for unjustified dismissal.

Matched passage: After that, An investigation meeting was initially set down for 22 November 2024 by audio visual link (AVL) to accommodate both parties.
DWYER v OAKVUE BLOODSTOCK LIMITED [2025] NZERA 251 - disadvantage succeeds but constructive-dismissal claim fails

Ms Dwyer brought sexual-harassment, unjustified-disadvantage, constructive-dismissal and good-faith claims arising from her work at Oakvue Bloodstock. The ERA separated the alleged harassment and resignation issues from specific employer actions that actually disadvantaged her employment.

Matched passage: ... considered those claims first. The Authority notes that For example, Ms Dwyer said at the investigation meeting she had raised concerns verbally with Ms Harris about how she was generally treated and feeling she was brushed off, and alleged Ms Harris' response included ...
Tammy Maxine Stevenson v Mountain Chalets (2005) Limited [2025] NZERA 248 - not dismissed, but unjustified disadvantage; casual label rejected, $8,000 compensation and holiday pay recalculation

Tammy Stevenson had worked regular cleaning hours for Mountain Chalets for years despite the employer describing her as casual. A dispute over guaranteed hours and a phone conversation then led her to claim dismissal and challenge the employer's treatment of her employment status and holiday entitlements.

Matched passage: ... James Purton and Hayley Laura Curtis Registry: Christchurch Authority member: David G Beck Investigation meeting: 3 and 4 March 2025 (Twizel) Determination date: 5 May 2025 Outcome: Unjustified dismissal not upheld; unjustified disadvantage upheld; compensation and holiday pay ...

Browse topics