ClickCease

Results for personal grievance

Showing 17-24 of 60 results
Redundancy Advice for Employers NZ | Restructure, Consultation and PG Risk

Employer redundancy guidance covering genuine business reasons, proposal documents, disclosure, consultation, selection criteria, redeployment and the personal-grievance risks of a predetermined process.

Matched passage: We assist employers with redundancy proposals, business case review, consultation letters, selection criteria, redeployment issues, final decision letters, mediation, and responses to Personal Grievances arising from redundancy.
90 Day Trial Periods for Employers NZ | Clause, Notice and PG Risk

Employer checklist for using a 90-day trial period: drafting the clause, signing before work starts, calculating the period, giving termination notice and avoiding defects that can revive a personal grievance.

Matched passage: Employers should not assume that a trial period clause automatically blocks a Personal Grievance.
"No win, no fee" for employers: when it exists and what to do instead

Why no-win-no-fee representation is rarely available to employers defending a personal grievance, and the alternative ways an employer can control legal or advocacy spend.

Matched passage: No win no fee - what employers need to know Employers regularly ask whether "no win no fee" is available to defend a Personal Grievance (PG) or an Employment Relations Authority (ERA) claim.
How MBIE employment mediation works

A step-by-step explanation of MBIE employment mediation from referral and preparation through opening positions, caucus negotiations, settlement drafting and what happens if no agreement is reached.

Matched passage: Done properly, it can resolve a Personal Grievance (PG) quickly, confidentially, and on terms you control - without waiting months for an ERA hearing.
Menzies v Corrigan [2025] NZEmpC 186 - employment advocate and employment lawyer conduct

Menzies v Corrigan concerned an ERA compliance order that required a company director personally to take steps to fund a liquidated employer so grievance remedies could be paid. The challenge raised questions about s 137(2), separate corporate personality and the reach of compliance jurisdiction.

Matched passage: Catherine Stewart Barrister Costs - Menzies v Corrigan [2025] NZEmpC 186 Mr Menzies was argued out of the ordinary limited-liability protection of his company in relation to personal grievance remedies owed by Prime Focus Security Limited, which was already in liquidation.

Browse topics