ClickCease

Results for employee contribution

Showing 17-23 of 23 results
EMA's case for regulating employment advocates is not evidence-led

A critique of the Employers and Manufacturers Association case for new regulation of employment advocates, focusing on whether the publicly identified evidence demonstrates widespread advocate-specific consumer harm.

Matched passage: Separate contributions to advocacy costs are not inherently improper EMA has also criticised settlement structures in which money is paid to the employee and a separate amount is paid towards the employee's representation costs.
Serious misconduct in NZ employment law - how to classify it (and why it matters more after 21 Feb 2026)

A practical framework for distinguishing ordinary misconduct from serious misconduct after the 2026 remedy amendments, with emphasis on the contractual standard, the facts proved and proportionality.

Matched passage: If the employee's actions are found to be serious misconduct and contributed to the situation, the ERA/Court may be required to award no remedy at all .
"No win, no fee" for employers: when it exists and what to do instead

Why no-win-no-fee representation is rarely available to employers defending a personal grievance, and the alternative ways an employer can control legal or advocacy spend.

Matched passage: Quick summary Employers generally pay their own costs as they go: the employee does not usually have money, and there is no realistic fund to "take a percentage of".

Browse topics