ClickCease

Results for disciplinary

Showing 17-24 of 108 results
Fiona Scott v Ritchies Transport Holdings Limited [2026] NZERA 342 - casual bus driver found to be permanent and unjustifiably dismissed

Fiona Scott signed a casual agreement with Ritchies but in practice regularly drove urban bus routes. After disciplinary issues arose, the employer relied on the casual characterisation and later ended her work, raising questions about her real status and the justification for dismissal.

Matched passage: It invited her first to an investigation meeting and then, after she did not attend due to not yet arranging union representation, to a disciplinary meeting.
Daniel Bly v FutureCo Limited [2026] NZERA 269 - dismissal for Instagram posts and Slack messages held unjustified; $15,000 compensation; 6 months' pay less 50% contribution

Daniel Bly was dismissed by FutureCo after Instagram posts and internal Slack messages became the subject of disciplinary allegations. The case tested both the seriousness of the conduct and whether the employer's investigation and dismissal response were proportionate.

Matched passage: Social media discipline needs evidence of harm: "reputation damage" is not assumed.
Adarsh Chand v Professional Stylish Barber Shop Limited [2026] NZERA 244 - unjustified constructive dismissal after unjustified warnings; $12,000 compensation + $14,560 reimbursement

Adarsh Chand resigned from Professional Stylish Barber Shop after disciplinary warnings and employment treatment he said had destroyed the relationship. The ERA examined whether the warning was substantively and procedurally justified and whether the resulting resignation was caused by the employer's breaches.

Matched passage: These allegations sat alongside the later disciplinary events that led to the end of employment.
Edmundo Marcelo v Golden Bulls Limited [2025] NZERA 814 - chef dismissed after failed food safety inspection; substantive grounds, but process flaws made dismissal unjustified; $13,707 ordered

Chef Edmundo Marcelo was dismissed by Golden Bulls after a failed food-safety inspection. The employer had substantive concerns about the incident, but the ERA examined whether those concerns were fairly put to him and whether the disciplinary decision was reached through a proper process.

TRAIL v VEOLIA WATER SERVICES LIMITED [2025] NZERA 353 - dismissal for workplace outbursts still unjustified

Veolia dismissed Mr Trail after a series of workplace outbursts, having previously issued a warning and then relied on later complaints. The ERA examined whether the proven conduct and disciplinary history could reasonably justify dismissal.

Matched passage: Later, Veolia dealt with these complaints through disciplinary action with Mr Trail and he was given a written warning for the first outburst with Mr Rozitis and then subsequently dismissed for the further outbursts with NSB.
Resink v Employment Services Limited [2025] NZERA 104 - constructive dismissal after continuing good-faith breaches

Employment Services pursued a disciplinary investigation without clearly identifying all allegations or providing requested information. An intimidating visit to recover Frank Resink's company vehicle became the last straw in continuing breaches of good faith.

Matched passage: 08 gross Compensation: $15,000 Contribution: no reduction Costs: reserved An unclear disciplinary investigation Mr Resink had worked for the labour-hire business for approximately two years.
Nicholas Gordon Pilcher v Brandt Tractor Limited [2026] NZERA 273 - dismissal for untested bullying complaints held unjustified; de facto suspension unjustified; $19,360 compensation + 4 months' lost pay

Brandt Tractor removed sales manager Nicholas Pilcher from the workplace on 'special leave', took his phone and laptop and then dismissed him five days later over four bullying and harassment complaints. He was not given the underlying complaints, even in redacted form, or a genuine chance to answer them.

Matched passage: 22 April 2024: dismissal for serious misconduct without a real investigation Five days later, on 22 April 2024, Mr Smith called Mr Pilcher.
Raheel Reddy v Studio Image Limited [2026] NZERA 323 - barber dismissed by text message after lateness and attendance issues

Barber Raheel Reddy was dismissed by text after ongoing lateness and attendance concerns. Studio Image argued he had resigned or that termination was justified, but there had been no proper disciplinary process giving him a fair opportunity to answer the concerns.

Browse topics