![Raheel Reddy v Studio Image Limited [2026] NZERA 323 - barber dismissed by text message after lateness and attendance issues](/Images/site/EmploymentAdvocatesAucklandCard.jpg)
The ERA found this was a dismissal, not a resignation, and that the dismissal was unjustified.
Search employment law articles and guides
Use the search box below (or in the menu bar above) to find topics and articles.
Search
Find employment law articles and guides quickly.
Tip: press / to search
Search tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases, eg "unfair dismissal".
- Use +word to require, -word to exclude, eg +redundancy -trial.
- Use OR to broaden, eg dismissal OR redundancy.
Popular searches
Browse topics
Unfair Dismissal (Unjustified Dismissal)
(20)
Redundancy
(38)
Personal Grievance (PG)
(16)
90 Day Trial Period (NZ)
(26)
Constructive Dismissal
(31)
Unjustified Disadvantage
(80)
Disciplinary Meetings and Investigations
(7)
Suspension from Work
(9)
Performance Management and PIPs
(5)
Workplace Bullying
(4)
Medical Incapacity Dismissal
(7)
Probationary Periods
(6)
No Win No Fee
(6)
Employment Lawyers and Advocates
(13)
Employment Mediation
(7)
Employment Relations Authority
(3)
Unfair Dismissal (Unjustified Dismissal) Case Summaries
(228)
Holidays Act
(11)
Casual Employment
(9)
Costs (ERA and Employment Court)
(7)
Employment Court
(10)
Employment Court Case Summaries
(11)
Special Interest Cases
(4)
Employment Law News and Opinion
(18)
Covid-19 Updates
(3)
Results for unfair dismissal
Showing 177-184 of 338 results
The ERA also found his redundancy dismissal was unjustified because ADL did not consult, did not provide a proposal, and did not explain the business reasons before ending his employment.
The ERA found the dismissal unjustified and ordered $32,432.
The ERA found she was an employee of Brutalitees Limited, not an independent contractor, and that her dismissal at a heated meeting on 19 September 2024 was unjustified.
The ERA found Wen Hui Lin was personally the employer, Mr Chen was a permanent full-time employee, and his dismissal was unjustified.
The resignation was a constructive dismissal, unjustified under s 103A, with $20,000 compensation and 5.
The ERA found there was no clear resignation, the 21 November text ended the employment, and the dismissal was unjustified.
Unfair Dismissal (Unjustified Dismissal) Case Summaries | ERA New Zealand
Constructive Dismissal
Unjustified Disadvantage
The ERA rejected the constructive dismissal claim because the STI was discretionary and annual,.
Browse topics
Popular topics
All topics
Dismissal & Job Loss
Employment Terms & Leave
Problems at Work
Getting Help
ERA & Employment Court
Cases, News & Commentary
No matching topic. Press Enter to search all employment law content.