ClickCease

Results for personal grievance

Showing 169-176 of 363 results
VLN v Elizabeth Rose Dotcom, Kim Dotcom and Contractors Only Limited [2026] NZERA 508 - urgent removal to Employment Court

VLN brought claims about employment status and minimum employment standards arising from work at properties associated with Elizabeth and Kim Dotcom. With possible extradition affecting witness availability and enforcement, VLN sought urgent removal of the whole proceeding from the ERA to the Employment Court before the Authority investigation occurred.

Matched passage: ... date: 29 July 2026 Underlying issue: whether VLN was an employee and, if so, entitlement to personal grievance and minimum employment standards remedies Alternative claim: if Contractors Only Limited was the employer, liability was alleged against Elizabeth Dotcom under Part 9A ...
Paul Adams v EverEdge Global Limited [2026] NZERA 509 - employer stopped paying founder to force resignation

EverEdge stopped paying founder and CEO Paul Adams while he continued working from Amsterdam, ignored repeated requests for his salary and later gave inconsistent explanations for the non-payment. Mr Adams ultimately resigned.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Askkan Vakilipour Takaloo v Kaur Queens Trading Limited [2026] NZERA 507 - taxi driver was an employee and constructively dismissed

Kaur Queens Trading labelled taxi driver Ashkan Vakilipour Takaloo an independent contractor, but controlled and integrated his work into its taxi business. The relationship broke down amid withheld wages, aggressive verbal abuse and cancellation of his ability to work out his notice.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Sione Afimeimounga v NPD Limited [2026] NZERA 506 - tanker driver constructively and unjustifiably dismissed

Tanker driver Sione Afimeimounga repeatedly raised workload, scheduling and health-and-safety concerns that NPD failed to resolve. After he resigned on extended notice, the employer suspended and summarily dismissed him over selected comments from a provocative text exchange with another driver.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Carol Chesmar v Rooney Earthmoving Limited [2026] NZERA 502 - redundancy consultation was more apparent than real

After more than nine years with Rooney Earthmoving, Carol Chesmar was selected for redundancy amid genuine work and financial pressure. The employer withheld information later relied on to justify the decision, did not consult about removing her from a major project and had effectively decided her role would go before consultation began.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
Jia Jia v TBS Trading Limited and Helen Han [2026] NZERA 478 - no employment agreement, late wages and radio-silent dismissal

Jia Jia began work for TBS Trading without a written employment agreement, experienced late wage payments and then found the employer stopped communicating and providing work. The case concerned whether that silence and withdrawal of work amounted to dismissal as well as separate pay and documentation breaches.

Matched passage: Short service does not remove personal grievance rights: an employee can still receive lost wages, compensation, penalties and costs even after a short period of employment.
Conner Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 480 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Conner Powell was made redundant by OH and N Contracting as forestry work wound down and no replacement work had been secured. The ERA accepted that business pressure was genuine but examined whether the employer consulted before deciding the redundancy and complied with notice and record obligations.

Matched passage: No contribution reduction The Authority had to consider whether Mr Powell's own actions contributed to the situation that gave rise to the personal grievance.
Philip Powell v OH and N Contracting Limited and Bradley Mooney [2026] NZERA 481 - genuine redundancy reason but no consultation, notice-pay breach and director recovery

Philip Powell was made redundant from OH and N Contracting as forestry work reduced and no replacement contract had been secured. The ERA accepted there was a genuine business reason to reduce staff but examined whether the employer had consulted, disclosed information, considered alternatives and paid notice correctly.

Matched passage: No contribution reduction The Authority had to consider whether Mr Powell's own conduct contributed to the situation that gave rise to the personal grievance.

Browse topics