ClickCease

Results for employee contribution

Showing 153-160 of 166 results
Haochen Guo v Su's Investment Limited [2025] NZERA 805 - suspension without process, bullying, and redundancy while on ACC leave; $25,000 compensation plus arrears and penalty

Haochen Guo was suspended, complained of bullying and was later made redundant while absent on ACC leave. The ERA examined the fairness of the suspension and workplace treatment as well as whether the purported redundancy was genuine and properly consulted on.

Matched passage: Do not ignore employees raising concerns: refusing to engage can worsen disadvantage and bullying allegations and can undermine later justification arguments.
Glenice Cooper v Success Realty [2025] NZERA 782 - redundancy, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

After 21 years as a marketing manager, Glenice Cooper was dismissed for redundancy by Success Realty. By the investigation meeting the employer conceded the dismissal was unjustified, leaving the ERA to determine the proper level of lost remuneration, bonus and compensation.

Matched passage: Section 128 of the Act states that where the Authority has determined that an employee has a personal grievance, and has lost remuneration as a result of that personal grievance, order the employer to pay to the employee the lessor of a sum equal to that.
Shenwei Zhang v Fat Dragon Restaurant Management Limited and Kejian Ji [2025] NZERA 737 - 'casual' label rejected; unjustified dismissal by WeChat; $5,686.33 reimbursement, $12,000 compensation, $9,904.08 arrears plus interest

Shenwei Zhang worked for Fat Dragon Restaurant Management under an arrangement the employer described as casual. After the relationship deteriorated, his work was ended through WeChat and he pursued dismissal, wage and holiday-pay claims.

Matched passage: The Authority found no deduction for contribution was warranted: the unjustifiability arose from the employer failing to meet minimum statutory obligations, and Mr Zhang was not blameworthy for those failures.
Jingsheng Liu v Legend International Holdings Limited, Hongyu Holding Limited and Wang Yu [2025] NZERA 702 - unjustified dismissal by 'no work next week' text; 4 weeks lost wages + notice arrears; $15,000 compensation; penalties and s 142Y leave

Cabinet maker Jingsheng Liu was told by text that there would be no work the following week after the business moved and operations shifted between related companies. There had been no consultation, termination process or reasonable notice.

Matched passage: No contribution reduction: no blameworthy conduct by Mr Liu contributed to the dismissal process failures.
Colin Bradshaw v Ocean To Alps Removal & Storage Limited [2025] NZERA 636 - dismissal claim failed, but unjustified disadvantage upheld; $15,000 compensation and wage arrears

Colin Bradshaw claimed he was dismissed after a confrontation during a removal job and a related pay dispute with Ocean To Alps. The ERA had to separate the alleged termination from the employer's subsequent handling of the incident, communications and unpaid hours.

Matched passage: The key issue at the outset being whether the employee has lost remuneration because of the grievance, and the further issues then arising relate to quantification of the loss.
Benjamin Thomas v Matthew Scott and Patricia Scott trading as Infinity Dairy [2025] NZERA 592 - indefinite paid suspension over prescribed medicinal cannabis; employer silence led to constructive dismissal; $33,545.75 awarded plus $4,571.55 costs/fee

Benjamin Thomas was placed on an open-ended paid suspension after issues arose about his prescribed medicinal-cannabis use. The employer then failed to progress a meaningful investigation or communicate a pathway back to work, and Mr Thomas eventually resigned alleging constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: The Authority found no blameworthy contribution by Mr Thomas, so there was no reduction under s 124.
Wang v Steel Master Co Ltd [2025] NZERA 457 - dismissal, not resignation; $11,000 compensation and 8 weeks lost wages

Steel Master said Mr Wang had resigned, but he had been given a choice between finding another job and being unilaterally dismissed. The ERA examined the objective effect of that ultimatum rather than the employer's description of the ending.

Matched passage: Contribution: no reduction.
BALI v R1i TECHNOLOGY LIMITED [2025] NZERA 409 - Webex dismissal without fair process

R1i Technology dismissed Mr Bali during a Webex meeting and then confirmed the decision in writing. The employer did not participate in the ERA proceeding and the evidence showed no meaningful process satisfying the minimum statutory tests of procedural fairness.

Matched passage: 00 is a fair and reasonable contribution towards his representation costs.

Browse topics