ClickCease

Results for unjustified dismissal

Showing 9-16 of 325 results
Yifu Jiang v Smartrade Limited [2026] NZERA 56 - fixed-term clause held unlawful; unjustified dismissal; $15,600 lost wages and $12,000 compensation

Smartrade treated Yifu Jiang's employment as ending under a one-year fixed-term clause, but the agreement did not record genuine reasons satisfying s 66. Mr Jiang was also given no meaningful chance to comment before the employer ended the relationship.

Matched passage: pdf"; } Yifu Jiang v Smartrade Limited [2026] NZERA 56 A detailed, plain-English summary of an Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination about an employer trying to rely on a fixed-term clause to end employment, and why the Authority found the dismissal was unjustified.
MAIORENKO v NEXT GENERATION HOMES LIMITED [2026] NZERA 28 - Unjustified dismissal upheld; $12,000 compensation; $7,000 lost wages; wage arrears ordered.

Next Generation Homes stopped providing Mr Maiorenko with work and ceased communicating with him after he queried pay and future work. The case concerned whether that conduct itself ended the employment relationship and what wage arrears remained outstanding.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2026] NZERA 28 Registry: Auckland Parties: MAIORENKO v NEXT GENERATION HOMES LIMITED Outcome: Unjustified dismissal upheld.
MA v NO.2 NOODLE NZ LIMITED [2026] NZERA 25 - Unjustified dismissal upheld; $9,500 compensation; one week wages; $500 penalty.

Ms Ma's short restaurant employment ended after management announced reduced hours and a disputed phone call, followed by her omission from the next roster. The employer said she was casual and had abandoned employment.

Matched passage: At the investigation meeting Ms Ma provided compelling evidence regarding the impact of the dismissal on her.
Jingsheng Liu v Legend International Holdings Limited, Hongyu Holding Limited and Wang Yu [2025] NZERA 702 - unjustified dismissal by 'no work next week' text; 4 weeks lost wages + notice arrears; $15,000 compensation; penalties and s 142Y leave

Cabinet maker Jingsheng Liu was told by text that there would be no work the following week after the business moved and operations shifted between related companies. There had been no consultation, termination process or reasonable notice.

Matched passage: That was an unjustified dismissal.
LEBRETON v DA HAI INVESTMENT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 451 - Unjustified dismissal found (employee succeeded).

Da Hai Investment treated Ms LeBreton as a casual worker despite an ongoing pattern of part-time work and an original offer suggesting minimum hours. The dispute covered the true status of the relationship, how it ended, sick leave, lost remuneration and statutory breaches.

Matched passage: ... NZERA 451 Registry: Christchurch Parties: LEBRETON v DA HAI INVESTMENT LIMITED Main issues: Unjustified dismissal, Constructive dismissal, Unjustified disadvantage, Wages, Holiday pay, Penalties, Costs Outcome: Unjustified dismissal found (employee succeeded). Story in plain ...
BOYD v WARD [2025] NZERA 352 - The personal grievance for unjustified dismissal was upheld.

Mr Ward dismissed Mr Boyd by letter and text message on 21 June 2024 and then did not participate in the ERA investigation despite being aware of the investigation meeting. The claim proceeded on Mr Boyd's evidence and documents.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 352 Registry: Christchurch Parties: BOYD v WARD Authority member: Peter van Keulen Hearing date: 14 April 2025 Outcome: The personal grievance for unjustified dismissal was upheld.
CHEN v CONSTRUST LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 20 - unjustified dismissal; compensation, wages and penalty

Mr Chen worked in a construction arrangement where the identity of the employer and the true nature of the relationship were disputed. Evidence at the ERA included inconsistent accounts about when Construst was first mentioned and the parties agreed the amount of lost remuneration if employment was established.

Matched passage: ... Determination date: 17 January 2025 Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Story in plain English The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. In summary, Changes to Mr Dai's evidence Mr Dai's evidence ...
Tihei Kereopa-Rerekura v Cruz Bar Ltd [2023] NZERA 376 - Unjustified dismissal during Covid isolation, redundancy not genuine

Tihei Kereopa-Rerekura's employment at Cruz Bar ended while Covid isolation requirements were affecting work. The employer relied on redundancy, but the ERA examined whether there was a genuine redundancy and whether any fair consultation process occurred before the employment ended.

Matched passage: Unjustified dismissal: Cruz Bar Limited unjustifiably dismissed Tihei and remedies were awarded.

Browse topics