ClickCease

Results for final pay

Showing 129-136 of 223 results
TRAIL v VEOLIA WATER SERVICES LIMITED [2025] NZERA 353 - dismissal for workplace outbursts still unjustified

Veolia dismissed Mr Trail after a series of workplace outbursts, having previously issued a warning and then relied on later complaints. The ERA examined whether the proven conduct and disciplinary history could reasonably justify dismissal.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Costs: Costs reserved.
BOYD v WARD [2025] NZERA 352 - The personal grievance for unjustified dismissal was upheld.

Mr Ward dismissed Mr Boyd by letter and text message on 21 June 2024 and then did not participate in the ERA investigation despite being aware of the investigation meeting. The claim proceeded on Mr Boyd's evidence and documents.

Matched passage: ) Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $15,000, $15,000.
RISELEY v HUNTLY JOINERY 2000 LIMITED [2025] NZERA 342 - employer breaches caused constructive dismissal

Mr Riseley resigned from Huntly Joinery after a series of employer actions that he said destroyed the employment relationship. The ERA had to decide whether those breaches were sufficiently serious and causative to turn the resignation into a constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $20,000.
LI v MASTER Z FOOD LIMITED [2025] NZERA 335 - WeChat evidence showed employer ended employment

Master Z Food said Ms Li resigned during an April 2023 meeting; Li said she was told the decision had already been made to dismiss her and she could merely work out the week. Contemporary WeChat messages were central to resolving who ended the employment.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $15,000 Costs: Costs considered.
PENNY v FRELLO LIMITED [2025] NZERA 317 - redundancy consultation and redeployment failures

Henry Penny was selected for redundancy from Frello's software-development team after a restructure intended to reduce headcount. He argued resignations had already reduced staff numbers, the selection outcome was predetermined, and consultation and redeployment were not genuine.

Matched passage: ) Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $20,000.
CHAUHAN and Anor v SD & SD INVESTMENTS LIMITED and Ors [2025] NZERA 309 - dismissal and wage claims upheld on roster evidence

The Chauhans worked in a business operated by SD & SD Investments, with disputes about hours worked, who knew about that work, and how Mr Chauhan's relationship with the business ended. The ERA preferred documentary roster and time-record evidence on key factual issues.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $10,000, $1,000.
RYDER v LEOPARD LIME LIMITED [2025] NZERA 266 - employer ended employment; dismissal unjustified

Mr Ryder's employment with Leopard Lime ended after an exchange in early November 2022 in which the employer maintained that he had not been dismissed. The case turned on what the communications objectively meant and whether any fair dismissal process had occurred.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $20,000 Costs: Costs reserved.
WATSON v ALCHEMY BUILDERS LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 265 - disadvantage claim fails but dismissal grievance succeeds

Mr Watson challenged a written warning and later alleged he was constructively dismissed after his relationship with Alchemy Builders deteriorated and he was removed from a workplace WhatsApp group. Timeliness affected the earlier disadvantage grievance.

Matched passage: Orders and payments mentioned Compensation: $15,000 Costs: Costs reserved.

Browse topics