ClickCease

Results for dismissal process

Showing 121-128 of 270 results
PUTAANGA v MOVE FREIGHT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 425 - medical-incapacity dismissal and unsafe-work disadvantage

MOVE Freight dismissed Mr Putaanga for medical incapacity after a workplace accident and a lengthy period assessing his prospects of returning to full-time work. He also alleged the employer had failed to provide a safe workplace and that this caused unjustified disadvantage.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 425 Registry: Christchurch Parties: PUTAANGA v MOVE FREIGHT LIMITED Authority member: Peter van Keulen Hearing date: 27 March 2025 Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful).
Lekeisha Ramsay v National Storage Ltd [2025] NZERA 269 - Probationary period dismissal held unjustified; $9,000 compensation + $14,040.40 lost wages; penalties dismissed

Lekeisha Ramsay was dismissed by National Storage just over three months into employment under a probationary arrangement. The ERA examined attendance and performance concerns, the adequacy of warnings and whether the employer had given her a fair opportunity to improve and respond before termination.

Matched passage: The handwritten notes recorded that the outcome to be delivered that day could include a warning, a performance improvement step, a first and final warning, or dismissal - and ultimately dismissal occurred that day.
CALLEN v ALARON PRODUCTS LIMITED [2025] NZERA 165 - dismissal grievance allowed; compensation and lost wages awarded

Mr Callen's unjustified-dismissal grievance against Alaron Products was not formally filed in the Authority until after the ordinary 90-day raising period had become an issue. The case addressed whether the grievance could nevertheless proceed and what remedies followed from the dismissal claim.

Matched passage: ... date: 19 March 2025 Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful). Story in plain English The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues (partly successful). In summary, Mr Callen then ...
BROWN v TIMBER TOWN HARVESTING LIMITED [2025] NZERA 117 - real dismissal reasons were not fairly put to the employee

Timber Town Harvesting summarily dismissed Mr Brown after relying on an earlier workplace incident and disputed warnings. The case examined whether the reasons actually relied on were properly put to him and whether he had been given a meaningful opportunity to understand and correct the employer's concerns.

Matched passage: Story in plain English The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
Thuy v Huynh [2025] NZERA 74 - 90-day trial failed; dismissal for seeking employment advice unjustified

A nail technician was dismissed during a purported 90-day trial after seeking advice about her employment rights. The employer had not complied with the notice requirement in its own trial clause.

Matched passage: An employer cannot treat an employee's attempt to obtain employment-law advice as misconduct justifying dismissal.
DUNG PHAM v HUYNH [2025] NZERA 75 - dismissal proved; lost remuneration and compensation awarded

Ms Dung Pham disputed the way her employment at a nail salon ended and sought remedies for dismissal. The Authority had to resolve conflicting accounts of whether and when the employer brought the employment relationship to an end.

Matched passage: ... 9-12 September 2024 (Wellington) Determination date: 14 February 2025 Outcome: Unjustified dismissal/disadvantage issues considered; see determination for full findings and orders. Story in plain English This decision deals with claims arising from an agreement to employ ...
PIACUN v COOPER NO 1 LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 32 - business sale did not avoid notice; dismissal unjustified

Cooper No 1 sold its business and told Ms Piacun her employment was ending, without paying a notice period. The ERA considered whether the sale itself ended employment or whether Cooper had taken the initiative to terminate her contract.

Matched passage: At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 32 Registry: Auckland Parties: PIACUN v COOPER NO 1 LIMITED and Anor Authority member: Antoinette Baker Hearing date: 1 October 2024 Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues.
Bridget Addy v Auckland Steam 'N' Dry Limited and Graeme Stephens [2022] NZERA 657 - constructive dismissal after a 'trial period' threat by text; $8,000 compensation, $3,600 reimbursement, $2,000 penalty

Auckland Steam 'N' Dry raised performance concerns with Bridget Addy by text and threatened that she would not make it through a supposed three-month trial, although her agreement contained no trial clause. She resigned in response.

Matched passage: Constructive dismissal was established: the Authority found the resignation was caused by the employer's breach of duty, and resignation was reasonably foreseeable.

Browse topics