ClickCease

Results for trial period dismissal

Showing 105-112 of 169 results
Shenwei Zhang v Fat Dragon Restaurant Management Limited and Kejian Ji [2025] NZERA 737 - 'casual' label rejected; unjustified dismissal by WeChat; $5,686.33 reimbursement, $12,000 compensation, $9,904.08 arrears plus interest

Shenwei Zhang worked for Fat Dragon Restaurant Management under an arrangement the employer described as casual. After the relationship deteriorated, his work was ended through WeChat and he pursued dismissal, wage and holiday-pay claims.

Matched passage: Mr Zhang treated that as a dismissal.
Xiaomeng Feng v Yoga Limited [2025] NZERA 709 - admitted unjustified dismissal, $12,400 remedies and no contribution reduction

Yoga Limited ultimately admitted that Xiaomeng Feng's dismissal was unjustified, leaving the ERA to determine lost wages, compensation, contribution and a claimed good-faith penalty. The employer relied on performance and communication concerns to seek a reduction.

Matched passage: The employer later accepted in its amended reply that the dismissal was unjustified.
PARKER-JONES v GPC ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED [2025] NZERA 571 - abandonment process unfair; dismissal unjustified

GPC treated Ms Parker-Jones as having abandoned her employment after a period involving significant medical issues and absence. The ERA examined whether the employer had enough information and followed a fair process before treating the relationship as ended.

Matched passage: ... 2025 (by AVL) (2 days) Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Story in plain English The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. In summary, Non-publication orders [3] Following the investigation ...
Hao v South Pole IP Holding (NZ) Limited [2025] NZERA 245 - pressure to resign caused constructive dismissal

South Pole treated Xinhua Hao as having agreed to resign, despite his repeated denials, then withheld work and continued pressing the resignation dispute. The ERA found those actions caused an unjustified constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: Why this case matters Hao v South Pole is a practical example of a disputed resignation becoming constructive dismissal.
FHE v Auckland Transport [2026] NZERA 552 - justified dismissal but unjustified initial suspension

Auckland Transport investigated FHE over serious conduct involving a former employee with whom he had been in a relationship. Before completing a fair consultation process over suspension, AT had already effectively removed him from work for two days.

Matched passage: But those shortcomings did not ultimately cause unfair treatment in the dismissal decision.
Sheridan v Pact Group [2026] NZEmpC 51 - medical incapacity dismissal overturned

Roseanne Sheridan developed PTSD after a serious threat from a resident at work and was dismissed for medical incapacity about six months later. Specialist ACC information and rehabilitation planning were still developing, and a return-to-work process had not been completed.

Matched passage: UrlEncode(judgmentUrl); } Sheridan v Pact Group [2026] NZEmpC 51 - medical incapacity dismissal overturned Roseanne Sheridan's medical-incapacity dismissal had been upheld by the Employment Relations Authority.
FEC v HES [2026] NZERA 475 - constructive dismissal failed but unjustified disadvantage found over home visits

FEC was a beginning school principal whose relationship with the board deteriorated after a parent-related incident. Among the challenged conduct were after-hours visits by the presiding member to FEC's home to deal with school employment matters, followed eventually by FEC's resignation.

Matched passage: pdf"; } FEC v HES [2026] NZERA 475 This Employment Relations Authority (ERA) determination concerns an anonymised school principal who resigned after a difficult period involving workload pressure, board issues, and an incident with a parent.
Steven David Mitchell v Tasman Rugby Union Incorporated [2026] NZERA 435 - CEO returned to payroll on interim reinstatement

Tasman Rugby Union dismissed chief executive Steven Mitchell after an organisational review became intertwined with later misconduct allegations. He sought interim reinstatement, arguing the process appeared predetermined and that his substantive dismissal grievance had real strength.

Matched passage: ... May 2026, by AVL Determination date: 2 July 2026 Role: Chief Executive Officer Employment period: June 2024 to 20 March 2026 Application decided: interim reinstatement only Dismissal allegation: summary dismissal for serious misconduct Authority's interim assessment: an ...

Browse topics