ClickCease

Results for trial period dismissal

Showing 89-96 of 169 results
CAMERON ROWETH v MT OUTDOORS LIMITED [2026] NZERA 50 - redundancy dismissal held unjustified due to no consultation on selection; $15,000 compensation, $5,400 lost remuneration, $1,800 notice

Mt Outdoors terminated seasonal retail worker Cameron Roweth's fixed-term role early when winter trading was weaker than expected. The business had a genuine need to reduce labour costs, but selected him for redundancy without consulting him about the selection decision.

Matched passage: Outcome: Unjustified dismissal upheld (selection for redundancy not justified due to lack of consultation).
Mark Beveridge v PVB Investments Limited: 'Bugger off' at the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn was an unjustified dismissal (2026 NZERA 51)

Cook Mark Beveridge was told to 'bugger off' and leave the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn during a confrontation connected with police concerns about marijuana plants on the owner's property. The employer disputed whether those words had actually ended the employment.

Matched passage: Mark Beveridge v PVB Investments Limited: 'Bugger off' at the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn was an unjustified dismissal (2026 NZERA 51) A cook was told to 'bugger off' and leave the premises amid police concerns about marijuana plants on the owner's property.
Fuyu Zhuo v BNS Co Limited and BNS Group Limited [2026] NZERA 45 - unjustified summary dismissal over till cash allegations; employer fidelity claim fails; $15,000 compensation and $3,000 penalty

Fuyu Zhuo was summarily dismissed and trespassed from a hospitality business after allegations that he had taken cash from the till. The employer's case also included a fidelity claim, while Mr Zhuo challenged the lack of a fair investigation and sought wage and holiday entitlements.

Matched passage: Bottom line: the Authority did not find a breach of fidelity/good faith by the employee during the period of employment.
Julie Curtis v Affordable UK Caravans and Parts Limited [2026] NZERA 46 - constructive dismissal after employer refused wages and delayed return; $25,000 compensation

Julie Curtis had a regular 20-hour week with Affordable UK Caravans when the employer told her there was no work until mid-January and refused to pay her contracted hours. She treated the prolonged exclusion from paid work as a serious breach and resigned.

Matched passage: Repudiation and constructive dismissal: refusing to provide work and refusing to pay contracted wages was a serious breach and repudiatory conduct.
Yu Chunyan, Sun Tingting, Liu Danhua, Zhang Shijie v Miaodi's Laundromat Ltd t/a Mr Suds and Yang Yang [2026] NZERA 31 - Unjustified dismissal, wage arrears, compensation and penalty

Four workers at Miaodi's Laundromat alleged their employment was ended without a fair process and that significant wage and holiday entitlements had not been paid. The proceeding also involved personal liability and penalties for minimum employment-standard breaches.

Matched passage: The decision records findings that wages were not paid when due and that withholding pay resulted in the employees being paid below minimum wage for much of the period.
MA v NO.2 NOODLE NZ LIMITED [2026] NZERA 25 - Unjustified dismissal upheld; $9,500 compensation; one week wages; $500 penalty.

Ms Ma's short restaurant employment ended after management announced reduced hours and a disputed phone call, followed by her omission from the next roster. The employer said she was casual and had abandoned employment.

Matched passage: At the investigation meeting Ms Ma provided compelling evidence regarding the impact of the dismissal on her.
Edmundo Marcelo v Golden Bulls Limited [2025] NZERA 814 - chef dismissed after failed food safety inspection; substantive grounds, but process flaws made dismissal unjustified; $13,707 ordered

Chef Edmundo Marcelo was dismissed by Golden Bulls after a failed food-safety inspection. The employer had substantive concerns about the incident, but the ERA examined whether those concerns were fairly put to him and whether the disciplinary decision was reached through a proper process.

Matched passage: Dismissal was substantively justified but procedurally flawed; the dismissal was therefore unjustified.
KMW v ZIB Digital Limited [2025] NZERA 806 - redundancy consultation called a 'charade'; unjustified dismissal; $47,692.30 awarded

KMW was selected for redundancy by ZIB Digital after a process the employee said had been predetermined and gave consultation no real prospect of changing the outcome. The ERA examined the business rationale, the information provided and whether the consultation was genuine.

Matched passage: ... date: 12 December 2025 Respondent: ZIB Digital Limited (ZIB) Outcome: redundancy dismissal unjustified; unjustified disadvantage and good faith breach findings; penalty declined; misrepresentation claims unsuccessful; costs reserved Remedies ordered: $20,000 ...

Browse topics