ClickCease

Results for personal grievance

Showing 89-96 of 363 results
Jasmine Woollett v Commissioner of Police [2026] NZERA 53 - Fiji deployment recall and unfair process; $21,000 compensation

Senior Sergeant Jasmine Woollett challenged decisions surrounding her Fiji deployment, including her recall and the process Police used after her working relationship with a deployment manager deteriorated. Her claim was for unjustified disadvantage rather than dismissal.

Matched passage: ... 14 and 15 May 2025 in Wellington Determination date: 30 January 2026 Main type of claim: Personal Grievance (PG) for unjustified disadvantage (not a dismissal case). Key orders: $21,000 compensation + $5,599.27 for loss of benefit; costs reserved. What happened Jasmine ...
Colin Bradshaw v Ocean To Alps Removal & Storage Limited [2025] NZERA 636 - dismissal claim failed, but unjustified disadvantage upheld; $15,000 compensation and wage arrears

Colin Bradshaw claimed he was dismissed after a confrontation during a removal job and a related pay dispute with Ocean To Alps. The ERA had to separate the alleged termination from the employer's subsequent handling of the incident, communications and unpaid hours.

Matched passage: Unjustified disadvantage and the pay dispute Although the dismissal claim failed, the Authority then considered the unjustified disadvantage grievance under s 103(1)(b).
XU v ABHYUDAYA LIMITED and Anor [2025] NZERA 502 - genuine redundancy but process unjustified

Architectural technician Ms Xu was told her role was redundant during a downturn in work. The employer had genuine commercial reasons to reduce staffing, but the decision was communicated without meaningful consultation beforehand.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
RAINA v HALL'S REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 469 - disciplinary process and dismissal procedurally unfair

Mr Raina faced disciplinary action by Hall's Refrigerated Transport, including a meeting invitation that did not tell him he could bring a support person and a generic warning that dismissal was possible. The case concerned both disadvantage during the process and the justification for the eventual termination.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
WRW v MCCARTHY ENTREPREISES LIMITED [2025] NZERA 452 - employer conduct caused constructive dismissal; no lost wages

WRW resigned after McCarthy Enterprises proposed changes to her work and the relationship deteriorated. The ERA had to decide whether the employer's conduct was sufficiently serious and causative to convert that resignation into a constructive dismissal and whether any wage loss was proved.

Matched passage: By her representative's letter dated 10 February 2023, WRW raised personal grievances.
KU v EMPLOYMENT FOCUS LIMITED TRADING AS PBRS and Anor [2025] NZERA 455 - redundancy process materially unfair

KU was made redundant by Employment Focus trading as PBRS after a restructure process in which meeting times, consultation steps, alternatives and redeployment were disputed. The ERA examined whether the business had genuinely consulted before moving from proposal to termination.

Matched passage: If you are considering raising a Personal Grievance (PG), the 90 day notification time limit can be critical.
TYACK v BIG B CARTAGE LIMITED [2025] NZERA 436 - text was not resignation; employer later dismissed employee

Big B Cartage said Mr Tyack had resigned by text, while Tyack maintained he had not and later attempted to return after a period of medical incapacity. The case turned on who actually ended the employment relationship and whether the employer could rely on the alleged resignation.

Matched passage: Section 123(1)(b) of the Act also provides for the reimbursement of the whole or any part of wages or other money lost by Mr Tyack should The Authority found that he has established a personal grievance.
PUTAANGA v MOVE FREIGHT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 425 - medical-incapacity dismissal and unsafe-work disadvantage

MOVE Freight dismissed Mr Putaanga for medical incapacity after a workplace accident and a lengthy period assessing his prospects of returning to full-time work. He also alleged the employer had failed to provide a safe workplace and that this caused unjustified disadvantage.

Matched passage: Based on this I assess the quantum of compensation for Mr Putaanga to be $9,000 for the unjustified disadvantage grievance and $12,000 for the unjustified dismissal.

Browse topics