ClickCease

Results for performance dismissal

Showing 73-80 of 86 results
Steven David Mitchell v Tasman Rugby Union Incorporated [2026] NZERA 435 - CEO returned to payroll on interim reinstatement

Tasman Rugby Union dismissed chief executive Steven Mitchell after an organisational review became intertwined with later misconduct allegations. He sought interim reinstatement, arguing the process appeared predetermined and that his substantive dismissal grievance had real strength.

Matched passage: ... period: June 2024 to 20 March 2026 Application decided: interim reinstatement only Dismissal allegation: summary dismissal for serious misconduct Authority's interim assessment: an arguable unjustified-dismissal claim with particular strength on predetermination 2026 ...
Wenpeng Yu v Golden Rooster NZ Trading Ltd [2026] NZERA 699 - one week employee was dismissed, not an abandonment

Golden Rooster said chef Wenpeng Yu abandoned his job after only one week, but WeChat messages supported his evidence that the employer had dismissed him because it was unhappy with his productivity. The ERA found no fair process had been followed and awarded $7,500 compensation, $3,559.20 lost wages and annual holiday pay.

Matched passage: Key point: an employer cannot convert a dismissal into abandonment merely by describing it that way later.
PARKER-JONES v GPC ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED [2025] NZERA 571 - abandonment process unfair; dismissal unjustified

GPC treated Ms Parker-Jones as having abandoned her employment after a period involving significant medical issues and absence. The ERA examined whether the employer had enough information and followed a fair process before treating the relationship as ended.

Matched passage: ... 2025 (by AVL) (2 days) Outcome: The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. Story in plain English The Authority ordered remedies and addressed unjustified dismissal issues. In summary, Non-publication orders [3] Following the investigation ...
Arnold Putt v George Weston Foods [2026] NZERA 179 - misconduct, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

Packaging operator Arnold Putt challenged disciplinary action by George Weston Foods after a confrontation with his production manager about task priorities. The ERA examined both the basis for a final written warning and whether shortcomings in the way the process was communicated caused a separate disadvantage.

Matched passage: Mr Putt said he had effectively been fired.
Brent Colyer v New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited [2026] NZERA 444 - flawed disciplinary process, written warning and unjustified disadvantage

Electrician Brent Colyer was investigated and given a written warning by New Zealand Aluminium Smelters after a gantry-crane incident involving another employee. He later resigned, alleging both unjustified disadvantage from the disciplinary process and constructive dismissal.

Matched passage: Constructive dismissal failed Mr Colyer resigned on 21 October 2024.
LUO v BAZ [2026] NZERA 549 - genuine redundancy undone by inadequate consultation and redeployment

BAZ had genuine commercial reasons to make Luo's role redundant, but the employee was not given a fair opportunity to engage with the proposal or meaningful redeployment possibilities before the decision was made.

Matched passage: The Employment Relations Authority found the redundancy dismissal unjustified and awarded $11,000 compensation.
Prasath Balachandariyar v Civtec Limited [2026] NZERA 302 - redundancy selection unfairly used asthma and wrist injury; compensation and lost wages ordered

Prasath Balachandariyar was selected for redundancy after workplace health issues including asthma and a wrist injury became part of the employer's assessment. He argued the selection process unfairly used his medical circumstances and that the employer had not conducted a fair redundancy process.

Matched passage: ... workplace wrist injury; modified duties; Records of Conversation; sick leave; unjustified dismissal; unjustified disadvantage; remedies Outcome: the redundancy rationale and process were accepted, but the selection scoring was unfair and the dismissal was unjustified; Civtec ...
Jasmine Woollett v Commissioner of Police [2026] NZERA 53 - Fiji deployment recall and unfair process; $21,000 compensation

Senior Sergeant Jasmine Woollett challenged decisions surrounding her Fiji deployment, including her recall and the process Police used after her working relationship with a deployment manager deteriorated. Her claim was for unjustified disadvantage rather than dismissal.

Matched passage: Her July 2023 performance review was positive.

Browse topics