ClickCease

Results for performance management

Showing 1-8 of 29 results
Fatima Fahmy v Minimarc Childcare Centre Inc [2026] NZERA 585 - performance dismissal lacked objective assessment

Minimarc Childcare dismissed ECE teacher Fatima Fahmy for performance after its centre manager remained the principal evaluator despite known relationship and bullying complaints. The ERA found the assessment was not sufficiently objective and ordered reinstatement, lost wages and $25,000 compensation.

Matched passage: Why this case matters Fahmy v Minimarc Childcare illustrates that procedural duration and repeated meetings do not establish objective performance management.
Briar Kennedy v Adulto HR Limited [2026] NZERA 537 - missing trial clause and predetermined performance dismissal

Adulto HR believed Briar Kennedy was on a 90-day trial, but the agreement given after she started contained no trial clause. The employer then purported to extend the nonexistent trial into probation and dismissed her after 97 days on qualification and performance grounds.

Matched passage: The performance process was inadequate Adulto did not give Ms Kennedy advance notice of the many concerns raised at the 3 May meeting.
Mandeep Singh v PR Kahlon Limited and Satpal Singh [2026] NZERA 521 - performance dismissal failed because employee was not fairly heard

PR Kahlon had genuine, documented concerns about delivery driver Mandeep Singh's performance and safety, but knew English was a serious barrier and still used English for critical disciplinary communications rather than Punjabi. His suspension and dismissal followed without a clear opportunity to understand and answer the case against him.

Matched passage: Injury and postponed performance meeting A further meeting was proposed in May 2024, but Mr Singh suffered a non-work knee injury and supplied an ACC form declaring him unfit for 14 days.
Arnold Putt v George Weston Foods [2026] NZERA 179 - misconduct, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

Packaging operator Arnold Putt challenged disciplinary action by George Weston Foods after a confrontation with his production manager about task priorities. The ERA examined both the basis for a final written warning and whether shortcomings in the way the process was communicated caused a separate disadvantage.

Glenice Cooper v Success Realty [2025] NZERA 782 - redundancy, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

After 21 years as a marketing manager, Glenice Cooper was dismissed for redundancy by Success Realty. By the investigation meeting the employer conceded the dismissal was unjustified, leaving the ERA to determine the proper level of lost remuneration, bonus and compensation.

Bridget Addy v Auckland Steam 'N' Dry Limited and Graeme Stephens [2022] NZERA 657 - constructive dismissal after a 'trial period' threat by text; $8,000 compensation, $3,600 reimbursement, $2,000 penalty

Auckland Steam 'N' Dry raised performance concerns with Bridget Addy by text and threatened that she would not make it through a supposed three-month trial, although her agreement contained no trial clause. She resigned in response.

Matched passage: Key findings Text message performance management was inappropriate: the Authority found performance concerns should have been raised face-to-face in good faith, in a supportive way, rather than by text.
Gemma Pedersen v Super Vape Store Limited [2026] NZERA 108 - dismissed by WhatsApp on KPI probation grounds without proper training; unjustified disadvantage and dismissal upheld; $15,917.48 ordered

Retail assistant Gemma Pedersen was dismissed by WhatsApp/email during a six-month probation period for allegedly missing sales KPIs. She said she had not received the promised practical training and had never been put through a genuine performance process before termination.

Matched passage: On 13 January 2025, without any prior performance meetings or warnings, SVSL emailed Ms Pedersen saying CCTV and KPI reports showed she had not met key performance indicators (basket size/value and customer sign-ups).
Shenwei Zhang v Fat Dragon Restaurant Management Limited and Kejian Ji [2025] NZERA 737 - 'casual' label rejected; unjustified dismissal by WeChat; $5,686.33 reimbursement, $12,000 compensation, $9,904.08 arrears plus interest

Shenwei Zhang worked for Fat Dragon Restaurant Management under an arrangement the employer described as casual. After the relationship deteriorated, his work was ended through WeChat and he pursued dismissal, wage and holiday-pay claims.

Matched passage: ... } Shenwei Zhang v Fat Dragon Restaurant Management Limited and Kejian Ji [2025] NZERA 737 A restaurant waiter was labelled "casual as required" in his written agreement, but the ERA looked at the reality: regular rosters over ...

Browse topics