ClickCease

Results for workplace investigation

Showing 57-64 of 290 results
Nata Venceslau Dos Santos v Nresh Group Limited [2026] NZERA 363 - hostile workplace, visa pressure, unjustified dismissal, wage arrears and penalties

Nata Venceslau Dos Santos described a hostile workplace in which visa-related pressure, pay issues and deteriorating treatment preceded the end of employment. The ERA considered dismissal alongside wage arrears and minimum employment-standard breaches.

Matched passage: ... Hodson and Sheridan Climo, counsel for Mr Dos Santos; Mark Donovan, counsel for Nresh Investigation meeting: 28 November 2025 in Auckland Information and submissions received: up to and including 20 May 2026 Determination date: 9 June 2026 Role: painter's assistant ...
TRAIL v VEOLIA WATER SERVICES LIMITED [2025] NZERA 353 - dismissal for workplace outbursts still unjustified

Veolia dismissed Mr Trail after a series of workplace outbursts, having previously issued a warning and then relied on later complaints. The ERA examined whether the proven conduct and disciplinary history could reasonably justify dismissal.

Matched passage: The determination records that The Authority's investigation [10] I investigated this employment relationship problem by receiving written evidence and documents, and by holding an investigation meeting on 11 March 2025.
SWENSON v AKITIO TRUCKING LIMITED [2025] NZERA 214 - unjustified dismissal with contribution reduction

Akitio Trucking dismissed Mr Swenson after concluding he punched another driver. He argued the employer had failed to deal with earlier theft allegations and that its investigation and dismissal process were unjustified.

Matched passage: In the end, Sufficiently investigated the allegations against Mr Swenson before dismissing him; b.
Ronald Thomas Shea v STLand Contracting Limited (in liquidation) [2026] NZERA 420 - dismissed by phone without a process

Ronald Shea's hours at STLand Contracting fell sharply before he was told by phone that there was no more work for him. He also alleged bullying and an unsafe workplace, while the employer had undertaken no redundancy or dismissal consultation.

Matched passage: ... liquidation) Representative: Jordan Grey, advocate for Mr Shea; no appearance for STLand Investigation meeting: 31 March 2026 at Hamilton Determination date: 29 June 2026 Role: Class 5 truck driver and contracting worker Key issues: dismissal or resignation; workplace change ...
HARRY SAMPSON v LYTTELTON PORT COMPANY LIMITED [2026] NZERA 17 - Preliminary time limit ruling; grievance in time; mediation directed.

Harry Sampson's proceeding against Lyttelton Port Company raised a preliminary 90-day time-limit issue before the merits of his personal grievance could be investigated. The employer argued the grievance was out of time; Mr Sampson relied on the communications by which he said it had been raised.

Matched passage: Outcome [52] For the reasons given, the Authority may continue to investigate Harry Sampson's personal grievance for unjustified dismissal, as raised by his 20 April 2022 correspondence.
PUTAANGA v MOVE FREIGHT LIMITED [2025] NZERA 425 - medical-incapacity dismissal and unsafe-work disadvantage

MOVE Freight dismissed Mr Putaanga for medical incapacity after a workplace accident and a lengthy period assessing his prospects of returning to full-time work. He also alleged the employer had failed to provide a safe workplace and that this caused unjustified disadvantage.

Matched passage: After that, In response to these events Mr Putaanga raised two personal grievances: (a) An unjustified action causing disadvantage arising out of the workplace accident and allegations that MOVe Freight did not adequately protect him.
Nicholas Gordon Pilcher v Brandt Tractor Limited [2026] NZERA 273 - dismissal for untested bullying complaints held unjustified; de facto suspension unjustified; $19,360 compensation + 4 months' lost pay

Brandt Tractor removed sales manager Nicholas Pilcher from the workplace on 'special leave', took his phone and laptop and then dismissed him five days later over four bullying and harassment complaints. He was not given the underlying complaints, even in redacted form, or a genuine chance to answer them.

Matched passage: 17 April 2024: "special leave" that functioned as a suspension On 17 April 2024 Brandt issued a letter titled "Commencement of Employment Investigation" and said it would appoint an independent investigator.
Haochen Guo v Su's Investment Limited [2025] NZERA 805 - suspension without process, bullying, and redundancy while on ACC leave; $25,000 compensation plus arrears and penalty

Haochen Guo was suspended, complained of bullying and was later made redundant while absent on ACC leave. The ERA examined the fairness of the suspension and workplace treatment as well as whether the purported redundancy was genuine and properly consulted on.

Matched passage: ... At a glance Citation: [2025] NZERA 805 Registry: Auckland Authority member: Simon Greening Investigation meeting: 4 December 2025 Submissions received: 4 December 2025 from the Applicant Determination date: 12 December 2025 Employment: chef at Coffee Studio from 27 February ...

Browse topics