ClickCease

Results for lost wages

Showing 57-64 of 212 results
Angus Jowitt v Gokula Music Limited [2026] NZERA 297 - music shop worker dismissed by text after coffee dispute; wage arrears, holidays, compensation and penalties ordered

Angus Jowitt worked in a music shop under a disputed contractor-or-employee arrangement and was paid cash below the rate the employer accepted had been agreed. After a conflict over work and coffee, the employer later relied on resignation rather than dismissal.

Matched passage: Total still owing for wages and holidays: $9,281.
Lyon Kawhaaru v The Deck Tahuna Limited [2026] NZERA 288 - cafe worker told by email he was 'instant dismissed' after customer incident; unjustified dismissal upheld; remedies reduced 25% for contribution

Lyon Kawhaaru was 'instant dismissed' by email from The Deck Tahuna after a customer incident at the Nelson café. The ERA examined what actually occurred, whether the employer fairly investigated it and how Mr Kawhaaru's own conduct should affect remedies.

Matched passage: Lost wages and related amounts Mr Kawhaaru obtained new employment starting 23 September 2024 (about 16 weeks after dismissal).
Adarsh Chand v Professional Stylish Barber Shop Limited [2026] NZERA 244 - unjustified constructive dismissal after unjustified warnings; $12,000 compensation + $14,560 reimbursement

Adarsh Chand resigned from Professional Stylish Barber Shop after disciplinary warnings and employment treatment he said had destroyed the relationship. The ERA examined whether the warning was substantively and procedurally justified and whether the resulting resignation was caused by the employer's breaches.

Matched passage: Reimbursement of lost wages: $14,560 (three months' salary) less PAYE.
Stephanie Martin v SAS Builders Limited [2026] NZERA 226 - genuine restructure but consultation and redeployment failures

SAS Builders made Stephanie Martin redundant during a 2024 restructure. The central issues were whether the commercial restructure was genuine, whether the consultation was fair, and whether she should have been considered for a new role created in the business.

Matched passage: 4 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng [2018] NZEmpC 113 Lost wages SAS's unjustified actions meant Ms Martin was not redeployed to an alternate role it created in the business, when a proper discharge of its obligations would have meant she would have been.
Gemma Pedersen v Super Vape Store Limited [2026] NZERA 108 - dismissed by WhatsApp on KPI probation grounds without proper training; unjustified disadvantage and dismissal upheld; $15,917.48 ordered

Retail assistant Gemma Pedersen was dismissed by WhatsApp/email during a six-month probation period for allegedly missing sales KPIs. She said she had not received the promised practical training and had never been put through a genuine performance process before termination.

Matched passage: ... reports Probation clause: six months probation; termination on one week's notice or pay in lieu Outcome: unjustified disadvantage (inadequate training) and unjustified dismissal (no fair process; probation misunderstanding) both upheld Orders: $2,000 compensation ...
Jack Wills v Complex Forme Limited [2026] NZERA 76 - health centre worker dismissed by silence after no contract and no pay; $25,526.80 ordered plus penalties

Jack Wills worked at Complex Forme without a written agreement and was not paid for 32 hours of work. After he sought clarity about pay and rostering, the employer stopped responding, removed his access and ceased providing work.

Matched passage: ... and removal from the roster amounted to dismissal; (3) unjustified disadvantage for unpaid wages; (4) remedies and penalties. Outcome: employment relationship existed; dismissal found and held unjustified; unpaid wages established as unjustified disadvantage. Orders to ...
Wallace v Tang & Son Ltd [2026] NZERA 67 - husband-and-wife chefs dismissed after management conflict; both succeed; $95,448 ordered

Husband-and-wife chefs working at Buoy Café were dismissed after an escalating conflict with new management. The employer did not properly investigate the allegations or give either employee a genuine opportunity to respond before deciding to terminate them.

Matched passage: Orders and deadlines The Authority ordered Tang & Son Limited to pay, within 28 days: Mr Wallace: $40,000 lost wages and $18,000 compensation.
Mark Beveridge v PVB Investments Limited: 'Bugger off' at the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn was an unjustified dismissal (2026 NZERA 51)

Cook Mark Beveridge was told to 'bugger off' and leave the Ashurst Deer N Duck Inn during a confrontation connected with police concerns about marijuana plants on the owner's property. The employer disputed whether those words had actually ended the employment.

Matched passage: The ERA found it had not, and ordered the accrued holiday pay with interest.

Browse topics