ClickCease

Results for suspension

Showing 41-44 of 44 results
STEWART v OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LIMITED (3265479), OPEN COUNTRY DAIRY LIMITED v STEWART (3275619) [2025] NZERA 330 - summary dismissal unjustified; 100% contribution removes lost wages

Open Country Dairy summarily dismissed Mr Stewart on the final day covered by his medical certificate after a disciplinary process. The ERA considered both the employer's process and Mr Stewart's own conduct when assessing justification and remedies.

Matched passage: Later, Also during the investigation meeting, Mr Peters gave evidence to the effect that notes were taken during the meeting where OCDL suspended Mr Stewart.
SWENSON v AKITIO TRUCKING LIMITED [2025] NZERA 214 - unjustified dismissal with contribution reduction

Akitio Trucking dismissed Mr Swenson after concluding he punched another driver. He argued the employer had failed to deal with earlier theft allegations and that its investigation and dismissal process were unjustified.

Matched passage: Later, Mr Swenson was suspended on pay and invited to a disciplinary meeting.
MCCANN v WINTON CAPITAL LIMITED [2025] NZERA 171 - constructive dismissal; substantial lost remuneration and compensation

Ms McCann resigned while on sick leave after conflict with Winton Capital, pressure around the employment relationship and removal of access to a senior executive's email and calendar. She alleged the cumulative conduct made continued employment untenable.

Matched passage: Ultimately, She says the litigation hold was actioned later that day, and Ms Hollows was given access to Ms McCann's work email account to ensure Ms McCann was not responding to any of Mr Meehan's emails on his behalf without him knowing until her access was suspended.
Gary Cotton v Darcee Gosling, Gosling Solutions Limited, and Rob Ralston [2022] NZERA 90 - employer identity dispute; sole trader held liable; summary dismissal unjustified; $19, - orders for lost wages, arrears, holiday pay, and compensation

Gary Cotton's case required the ERA to identify who his employer actually was after work performed through Gosling Solutions and dealings involving Darcee Gosling and Rob Ralston. The case also concerned a summary termination and claims for unpaid employment entitlements.

Matched passage: The respondents argued Mr Cotton was employed by Mr Ralston (said to be a sole trader), and that work was "suspended" because it was unsafe for Mr Cotton to work unsupervised due to Mr Ralston's medical issues.

Browse topics