ClickCease

Results for redundancy consultation

Showing 41-48 of 74 results
Glenice Cooper v Success Realty [2025] NZERA 782 - redundancy, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

After 21 years as a marketing manager, Glenice Cooper was dismissed for redundancy by Success Realty. By the investigation meeting the employer conceded the dismissal was unjustified, leaving the ERA to determine the proper level of lost remuneration, bonus and compensation.

Matched passage: For redundancy, genuineness and process are separate: consultation and redeployment assessment remain critical.
UDUMULLAGA v HOPKINS JOINERY LIMITED [2025] NZERA 270 - employer-prepared resignation and redundancy dismissal unjustified

Ms Udumullaga was presented with an employer-prepared resignation letter and was later told her job had already been disestablished. The dispute concerned redundancy, periods when she said she was fit and available to work, unpaid entitlements, and whether the employer's process was genuine and fair.

Matched passage: Practical takeaways Redundancy determinations usually turn on genuineness and consultation quality.
Sophie Kennett v Polygon GY Developments Limited [2026] NZERA 405 - engineered resignation, redundancy and Holidays Act entitlements

Sophie Kennett resigned from Polygon GY Developments after a course of conduct she said was designed to force her out, in a context also involving a claimed redundancy and unpaid Holidays Act entitlements. The ERA examined the reality of the resignation rather than only its formal label.

Matched passage: Polygon also did not provide the purchaser with Ms Kennett's employment agreement, did not demonstrate that it properly explained the restructure's impact on her, and did not put her concerns or ideas to the purchaser before the consultation meeting took place.
Prasath Balachandariyar v Civtec Limited [2026] NZERA 302 - redundancy selection unfairly used asthma and wrist injury; compensation and lost wages ordered

Prasath Balachandariyar was selected for redundancy after workplace health issues including asthma and a wrist injury became part of the employer's assessment. He argued the selection process unfairly used his medical circumstances and that the employer had not conducted a fair redundancy process.

Matched passage: He was given two weeks' notice of termination for redundancy.
Wendy Darrell v Canterbury Vehicle [2026] NZERA 35 - redundancy, unjustified disadvantage and dismissal

Wendy Darrell's dispute with Canterbury Vehicle concerned the ending of her employment and associated employment entitlements. The ERA considered whether the employer's conduct met the justification standard and what compensation or payments were required for the breaches established.

Matched passage: Key themes recorded include: [40] Then in a follow up email at 10:49 am on 26 September 2024 CVC confirmed its dismissal of Ms Darrell by serving a notice of redundancy that terminated her employment with immediate effect and advised that no redundancy payment would be made.
Employment Law Help for Employers NZ | Staff Disputes, PGs and ERA Claims

Employer-side help for personal grievances, disciplinary problems, redundancy, mediation and ERA claims, with an emphasis on fixing process risks early and preserving evidence before positions harden.

Matched passage: We assist employers with employment relationship problems, Personal Grievance responses, disciplinary processes, redundancy consultation, mediation, settlement strategy, Employment Relations Authority matters, and practical risk control.
Redundancy

Redundancy

Topic
38 articles

Redundancy is defined at common law as a situation where an employee's position becomes surplus to the needs of the employer. A redundancy is treated by the Courts as a dismissal, therefore it must be genuine and carried out in a procedurally fair way.

Continue
HILL v TAMAKI LABOUR HIRE LIMITED [2025] NZERA 100 - personal grievance partly successful; remedies limited to proven breaches

Mr Hill challenged the ending of his employment with Tamaki Labour Hire and associated treatment during the employment relationship. The case required the ERA to separate the parts of his grievance that were established from claims for which the evidence did not justify relief.

Matched passage: In summary, Tamaki further denies any bullying occurred and says the suspension during the redundancy consultation period was justifiable in all the circumstances.

Browse topics