ClickCease

Results for employee contribution

Showing 41-48 of 196 results
Selwyn McDonald v Traffica Roading Services Limited [2026] NZERA 360 - on-the-spot dismissal after heated worksite exchange

Traffica summarily dismissed foreman Selwyn McDonald on site after a heated exchange with a director. The ERA accepted that Mr McDonald made serious disrespectful comments with racial connotations, but he was given no chance to answer before being fired.

Matched passage: ... alleged aggressive conduct; final written warning; failed THC test; procedural fairness; contribution Unjustified dismissal: established Unjustified disadvantage / bullying: not established Lost wages: one month assessed at $6,400 gross before contribution; final order ...
Auto John Huntley-Byrne v Dallison 2021 Limited [2026] NZERA 354 - unjustified café dismissal by text message

Dallison 2021 dismissed café worker Auto John Huntley-Byrne by text after end-of-shift tasks were left incomplete. Although the employer had legitimate concerns, it did not hold a proper disciplinary meeting or provide the support-person and response rights required by its own documents.

Matched passage: 20 gross before contribution; $7,469.
Jennifer Jacobsen v Cube Innovations Limited [2026] NZERA 356 - invalid trial period, no notice, and dismissal by email

Jennifer Jacobsen was dismissed by email only days into part-time work for Cube Innovations. Cube relied on a 90-day trial even though the evidence indicated she had started work before signing the agreement and the employer had not given the contractual notice required by the clause.

Matched passage: KiwiSaver lost benefit Ms Jacobsen also sought the employer KiwiSaver contributions she would have received if she had not been unjustifiably dismissed.
Raheel Reddy v Studio Image Limited [2026] NZERA 323 - barber dismissed by text message after lateness and attendance issues

Barber Raheel Reddy was dismissed by text after ongoing lateness and attendance concerns. Studio Image argued he had resigned or that termination was justified, but there had been no proper disciplinary process giving him a fair opportunity to answer the concerns.

Matched passage: ... argument; lateness and attendance concerns; procedural fairness; good faith penalty; contribution Dismissal finding: unjustified dismissal Good faith penalty: declined Contribution: 20 percent reduction to compensation only Orders: $14,121.90 gross lost wages, plus 8 ...
Natalie Butler-Smith v David and Dale Cavey t/a DG and DV Cavey Partnership [2026] NZERA 324 - farm assistant dismissed before returning from parental leave

Part-time farm assistant Natalie Butler-Smith was dismissed in February 2024 around the end of parental leave, with the employers raising health-and-safety concerns and disputing aspects of work performed during leave. The respondents did not appear at the investigation meeting.

Matched passage: ... leave; lost wages; notice pay; compensation Dismissal finding: unjustified dismissal Contribution: no contribution reduction Penalty: no penalty imposed for the record keeping issue Total ordered: $32,432, plus costs reserved Costs: reserved The short point The employer ...
Anna Murgatroyd v Xero (NZ) Limited [2026] NZERA 305 - redundancy procedurally unfair but no sham; compensation and lost wages ordered

Anna Murgatroyd was selected for redundancy from Xero's education team after a restructure. She alleged the process was predetermined, relying on an earlier Miro board, and also challenged the use of performance-related comments by a selection panel that included her manager.

Matched passage: However, the ERA then reduced that compensation by 20 percent for contribution under s 124.
Emily Grinsted v Bunnings Limited [2026] NZERA 236 - STI bonus claim succeeds; four other disadvantage claims fail

Emily Grinsted, Bunnings' New Zealand People and Culture Manager, brought five unjustified-disadvantage claims while remaining employed. The complaints concerned how criticisms were raised, information and duties, contractual obligations and a short-term incentive bonus.

Matched passage: Check the PDF for full context (gross/net, tax, contribution, and deadlines).
Arnold Putt v George Weston Foods [2026] NZERA 179 - misconduct, performance; what the ERA decided and what was ordered

Packaging operator Arnold Putt challenged disciplinary action by George Weston Foods after a confrontation with his production manager about task priorities. The ERA examined both the basis for a final written warning and whether shortcomings in the way the process was communicated caused a separate disadvantage.

Matched passage: 00 under s 123(1)(c)(i) Contribution deduction: Nil Leave reimbursement / wage-type remedy: No order made Costs: Reserved Note: check the determination itself for the authoritative wording of the orders and any later costs determination.

Browse topics