ClickCease

Results for employee contribution

Showing 33-40 of 196 results
Gumbeze v Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki [2024] NZEmpC 133 - serious misconduct finding overturned

Oranga Tamariki summarily dismissed social worker Bigson Gumbeze after an external investigation into complaints about his supervision, dealings with managers and aspects of his practice. The ERA upheld the dismissal, but he challenged that result afresh in the Employment Court.

Matched passage: ... unjustified Lost remuneration: $79,015 gross - one year's salary Compensation: $35,000 Contribution: no reduction What the Authority had decided Mr Gumbeze was a care and protection social worker who was summarily dismissed in 2017 after an external investigation into ...
Sione Afimeimounga v NPD Limited [2026] NZERA 506 - tanker driver constructively and unjustifiably dismissed

Tanker driver Sione Afimeimounga repeatedly raised workload, scheduling and health-and-safety concerns that NPD failed to resolve. After he resigned on extended notice, the employer suspended and summarily dismissed him over selected comments from a provocative text exchange with another driver.

Matched passage: The case also confirms that accepting paid leave does not automatically cure an unjustified suspension and that an employee must be heard by the person who actually decides their employment will end.
Sukhmanpreet Singh v JIT Limited, Davinder Pal and Harmanpreet Kaur Sandhu [2026] NZERA 453 - forced leave request, unjustified suspension and dismissal

Sukhmanpreet Singh's dispute with JIT arose after he was pressed to submit an annual-leave request and a confrontation followed. JIT then cancelled his shifts on claimed mental-stress grounds and later dismissed him for serious misconduct, while the ERA examined the conduct of both sides.

Matched passage: Remedies and contribution Mr Singh was awarded lost remuneration for 13 weeks, calculated on the 30-hour weekly roster at $30 per hour, with earnings from later work deducted and 8 percent holiday pay added.
Amanda Bradley v Fire and Emergency New Zealand [2026] NZERA 441 - FireSuper eligibility and poor communication

Amanda Bradley challenged FENZ's handling of her eligibility for FireSuper and the way information about that benefit was communicated after she took a newly created regional training-management role. The case focused on whether misleading or inadequate communication caused an employment disadvantage.

Matched passage: Remedy: $5,000 compensation with no contribution reduction The Authority assessed compensation under section 123(1)(c)(i) at $5,000.
Ilalio Solomona v Auckland Council [2026] NZERA 418 - conflict of interest dismissal unjustified

Ilalio Solomona was dismissed by Auckland Council after conflict-of-interest concerns about his outside personal-training business. Although his employment obligations could legitimately restrict outside activity, the disciplinary process did not put the contractual obligations actually relied on to him for response.

Matched passage: It awarded four weeks' ordinary time remuneration, calculated at $2,224 gross before contribution.
Neil Hall v Consultex Company Limited [2026] NZERA 410 - genuine redundancy but unjustified process

Neil Hall was made redundant from Consultex's Northland asbestos and mould work after a downturn that gave the employer a genuine reason to reduce headcount. The dispute centred on whether Consultex complied with its good-faith information and consultation obligations before choosing and implementing the redundancy.

Matched passage: It held that permissible preparatory steps, including incorporation of a potential competing business, are not blameworthy conduct for contribution purposes where they do not breach a contractual obligation and the employee does not trade in competition while still employed.
Four Applicants v A Respondent [2026] NZERA 407 - union activity discrimination, duress, and work-from-home disadvantage

Four salaried union members alleged that a senior manager pressured them over strike action and delegate activity and that striking staff were temporarily denied discretionary work-from-home access. The non-publication case tested discrimination and duress protections connected with lawful union activity.

Matched passage: The Authority also found that a short-lived decision to deny striking employees access to discretionary work-from-home arrangements was discriminatory.
Rakai Tawhiwhirangi v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [2026] NZERA 402 - unjustified dismissal after self-defence acquittal

Corrections dismissed prison officer Rakai Tawhiwhirangi for alleged unjustified use of force after an incident that also resulted in a criminal prosecution in which he was acquitted on self-defence grounds. The ERA examined the employer's independent investigation, the evidence available and the fairness of the serious-misconduct conclusion.

Matched passage: ... fairness of investigation; decision-maker impartiality; unnotified concerns; reinstatement; contribution Outcome: unjustified dismissal established Reinstatement: declined as not reasonable or practicable Compensation: $17,000 after a 15 percent contribution reduction Lost ...

Browse topics